User talk:Cgmellor

November 2011[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Color, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Wknight94 ^talk 19:37, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Color. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The reverted edit can be found here. Vrenator ^talk 14:46, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

While I would completely agree with you being an English person that the spelling of the word should be "Colour" rather than "Color" there is a clear section on the article's Talk Page Talk:Color discussion the spelling. By changing the article and inserting your comments your edits will be considered vandalism and will be reverted. Vrenator ^talk 14:55, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have now been warned twice not to make that change. Don't do it a third time, or you will be reported for it. Wikipedia has rules about this. And "color" is not "incorrect", it's simply a variant spelling. See WP:ENGVAR for further info. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 15:33, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 14:51, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Color, you will be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Color was changed by Cgmellor (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.957359 on 2011-11-04T16:35:58+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:36, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used mainly for trolling, disruption or harassment. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Wknight94 ^talk 16:56, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cgmellor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Unfairly blocked, without official warning and for no apparent reason — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cgmellor (talk • contribs)

Decline reason:

I count six warnings on this page concerning your edits. I see no reason to unblock you so you can accumulate more for behaviour which I have no reason to believe will cease if you were to be unblocked. WilliamH (talk) 23:32, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The reasons are listed on this very page. You were told to stop, and you wouldn't stop. Voila, you're blocked. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 23:12, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cgmellor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

What reasons? I haven't done anything wrong. I can't count 6 examples anyway. Are you really going to make me go through the trouble of creating a new account? Cgmellor (talk) 15:46, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

There are several warning templates on your page, along with several comments of some users why the edit you made should not be done. I am not trying to make you feel unwelcome, but if you persist the same behaviour after several editors warn you that simply leads to a block to prevent disruption

Creating a new account while blocked is not allowed par the block and Sockpuppetry policy - Threatening to break more rules in an unblock request is also not really a good idea to get unblocked. Excirial^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 16:05, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Looks like I will have to make a new account then. "I am not trying to make you feel unwelcome" just highlights the arrogance of wikipedia "editors" and "administrators if I'm honest.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cgmellor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Quite clearly made my point and accepted that you do not aprove my corrections to the colour page regarding how colour should be spelt. (Which for any of you Americans out there is spelt "colour" not "color"). I feel most of the editors and administrators have been quite childish, filling my page with wikipedia jargon about wikipedia spelling, I get it ok! The yanks don't know how to spell colour I will let them have their little morale victory. (And don't anyone accuse me of racism or anything like that. I am a US citizen and pay US taxes).

Decline reason:

Not an unblock request as far as I can tell. Also, it is 'approve' and 'moral'. Syrthiss (talk) 16:35, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Threatening to create sockpuppets is not your wisest decision. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 22:09, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkpage access revoked. Syrthiss (talk) 19:18, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]