User talk:Chandelier27

Hello, Chandelier27, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Can you edit Zutara to make more sense to poor people like me who have no idea what it is about? You might also want to look at WP:NEO, in case this is a term not widely used.

Again, welcome! NickelShoe (Talk) 16:17, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Zutara. This is a romance betweent Zuko and Katara in the TV show on Nickelodeon, Avatar: the last airbender. Many people say this will happen. About half the viewers feel this way. other viewers like Kataang better (Kataang being a romance betweent Katara and Aang.) The writers of avatar are not likely to do either, because it is too pressuring to do either. If the writers (Brian and Mike) did one romance, half the viewers would stop watching the show. It is most likely that Katara will end up with someone like Haru, who is good for her. Jet would be an option too, but it is infered that he dies in the Episode: Lake Laogai, after a fierce battle with Long Feng (head of the Dai Li). Kataang is kind of already happening, but Zutara MIGHT, just might, still have a chance.

I appreciate your enthusiasm, but honestly, I think your article might be better suited for a fansite. Wikipedia has a policy against articles that are based on speculation...you might want to read WP:V. Anyway, good luck, and let me know if there's anything I can help you with. NickelShoe (Talk) 17:04, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nonsense Page[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome your help to create new content, but your recent additions (such as Chandelier27) are considered nonsense. Please refrain from creating nonsense articles. If you want to test things out, edit the sandbox instead. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Pedro1999a (talk • contribs) 11:50, 16 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

JNS[edit]

The article JNS has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki 15:45, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Same with Zutara. NawlinWiki 15:54, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD Nomination: Otto price[edit]

An editor has nominated the article Otto price for deletion, under the Articles for deletion process. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the nomination (also see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Your opinions on why the topic of the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome: participate in the discussion by editing Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Otto price. Add four tildes like this ˜˜˜˜ to sign your comments. You can also edit the article Otto price during the discussion, but do not remove the "Articles for Deletion" template (the box at the top of the article), this will not end the deletion debate. Jayden54Bot 16:48, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]