User talk:Comte de Chagny

Welcome to my civilized talk page.

Please scroll down to append your message at the bottom or start a new topic.

?

Four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your message would automagically sign and date it.
Unless asked otherwise, I may respond on your Talk page or on the Talk page of the specific article. If the dialog gets interesting, a link to the other half can be added here.
The puzzle is discussed here.
To send me an email message, see the left-hand panel, but I prefer to talk in the open.
Please follow talk page guidelines and wikiquette.

File:Avatar 6.png listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Avatar 6.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 01:12, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:NSCPAHL.png[edit]

⚠
Thanks for uploading File:NSCPAHL.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:08, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:NSCPAHL.png[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:NSCPAHL.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 01:28, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And please do not remove deletion discussion tags for discussions in progress. These should only be removed when the discussion is complete. SchuminWeb (Talk) 06:08, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Leo Wanta for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Leo Wanta is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leo Wanta (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. j⚛e decker ^talk 07:34, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Trickle-down economics[edit]

Hi Comte de Chagny, I see that you are a professional economist. I wonder if you could help with Trickle-down economics. There has been a fairly long-running dispute as to whether anyone has actually argued for trickle-down economics, i.e. giving money to the rich through tax cuts, as opposed to hoping that the rich will invest more if they are taxed less. Most RS on the page say that it is a theory, but they are all from sources critical of trickle-down economics. In contrast, a few sources say that no economist or politician has ever proposed this theory, but there are not very many of these. I wonder if you knew of any more sources that would help either way, i.e. either a source arguing that giving the rich more money through tax cuts would help poorer people, or one saying that no one had proposed it. Thanks! Absolutelypuremilk (talk) 19:25, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]