User talk:Dusti

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

The Signpost: 22 October 2014[edit]

Your closure[edit]

After your decision at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Tourism International, where you wrote the phrase Keep then stated there is "no consensus to delete," the nominator went back in to change the published verdict here as no consensus and reverted it again here when I corrected this. As a lengthy background, this nominator and I have been battling over what I consider his habit of improper nominations without doing any WP:BEFORE research, particularly around the subject of beauty pageants, but I've subsequently discovered this is a wholesale habit of his editing. So he's anticipating that I will take him to ANI about his editing practices, which I will probably have to do and is playing a petty little game to soften the accumulation of negative points against his series of nominations. Yes, we are down to counting how many Keeps he has against him vs how many no consensus decisions. That is why this is significant. So this what your wrote as your decision, he has changed it. I guess you can deal with this from here. Trackinfo (talk) 20:01, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

I read The result was keep. After being relisted twice there is no consensus to delete. as "Keep as no consensus". If that is wrong, he should change the wording.
Second, Drmies had clearly stated that you should stop with harassing and personal attacks on me or face consequences... The Banner talk 22:41, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
@The Banner: - no. The bold lettering says keep, which is accurate. Any individual reading the page would realize that the close was keep. Further, the explanation of "After being relisted twice there's no consensus to delete" is just that, a further explanation. Result = Keep. Reason, it was relisted twice and there's no consensus to delete it. That doesn't make the result no consensus. Should you run across any other closes of mine that you have questions about, please do let me know. Dusti*Let's talk!* 01:11, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Dusti, sorry for landing on your talk page without invitation. I'm here because Banner asked me to have a look at Trackinfo's bad-mouthing; Trackinfo has a habit of doing that so that it's basically become a kind of harassment; what saves him from a block here is the "what I consider" phrase, and your soothing influence. Trackinfo, enough already. Shit or get off the pot: take him to ANI or stop yakking about him everywhere you go. Dusti, sorry for busing into your evening routine: carry on! Drmies (talk) 01:39, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
@Drmies: seems like a game between the two - but I digress. I have a soothing influence, *blushes* Oh stop it! :) Back to my regularly scheduled programming! Dusti*Let's talk!* 02:25, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
Ew, Diet Coke. I do like House; there's a couple of editors who remind me of the main character. My regular programming is football and water--a rather unmanly combination, I admit, but I'll do anything to prevent being associated with Hardee's commercials. Hey, I remember your old RfAs. That was a while ago. Have you ever considered trying again? Drmies (talk) 02:48, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
I have, and I do plan to in the near future (maybe after Christmas - or before when everyone's in a giving mood :p). Want to get a few more months under my belt. Hardee's! I haven't heard that name in ages! Dusti*Let's talk!* 02:55, 27 October 2014 (UTC)