User talk:Efenstor

Welcome!

Hello Efenstor, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- Longhair | Talk 08:33, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Sources for Ođđa mailbmi[edit]

Hello, good work on Ođđa mailbmi, and thanks for the contribution. However, you did not provide any references or sources in the article. Keeping Wikipedia accurate and verifiable is very important, and as you might be aware there is currently a push to encourage editors to cite the sources they used when adding content. Can you list in the article any websites, books, or other sources that will allow people to verify the content in Ođđa mailbmi? You can simply add links, or see WP:CITET for different citation methods. Thanks! BRIAN0918 13:59, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I've added an external link to the band's page, that's where I've taken the most of information. Also from the video itself but it cannot be cited. Also long ago I used a Sami-English dictionary to translate the name of the song but I don't think I'll find it again on the web now. Don't I have a right to describe a video myself, why should I always cite somesone even for that? Is that someone have better eyes than me? Efenstor

Image copyright problem with Image:Mana panorama.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Mana panorama.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. cohesion★talk 09:07, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The problem's fixed now. I am the author and the copyright holder of the photo myself. Efenstor 19:19, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tagging Latvia sections as pov[edit]

Hi, a while ago you tagged History and demographics sections as POV. Can you tell the reasons so that the sections can be actually improved? Because now without any reasons the only thing to do is to remove the templates. Renata 02:56, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the corresponding discussion page, there are many people complaint about the non-encyclopedic approach of the article. I personally can notice many allegations and the ethnic situation statement somewhat reminiscent of Nazi agitation. The main part of the Demographics sub-article consists only of such agitations without any actual description of the demographics, only the numeral data given. The term minority used with Russians is also may be considered non-objective since they are as much as the 29% of the population. If you're a Latvian yourself please try to look at the situation neutrally as a foreign, try to use data from foreign non-politically-interested sources. The articles about the other baltic states (Estonia, Lithuania) which were under the Soviet occupation as well are written much more factually and neutrally, I can recommend to use them as templates. Efenstor 20:43, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on Talk:Latvia. Please answer there. Renata 12:19, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Reptoid2.jpg[edit]

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Reptoid2.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Tempshill 19:51, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The image appears on a variety of web-pages ([1], [2], [3]) and nowhere it is stated whether it is copyrighted or not, thus I think it may be considered "fair use" at least for the use in the article on the topic. Efenstor 20:29, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Shaman (band)[edit]

Hi. As part of the Wikipedia:Disambiguation pages with links project, I have been making links to the Trance disambiguation page point to the relevant article.

I noticed that you have made most of the contributions to the Shaman (band) article and wondered if you could help me. At present, the article claims that the band's music has an "entrancing atmosphere" with a link to the trance page. Is their music used to induce an altered state of consciousness? If so, then perhaps the sentence could be rewritten to make this more clear and the link moved to point to that article. Otherwise, the link should probably be removed.

I look forward to your input on this matter.

Thanks, --Matthew Auger 22:44, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the link. Though the band's music is actually able to entrance, I just wanted to give readers a hint on what trance is and what it's felt like. Efenstor 07:28, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your prompt reply and action. I feel that it is far better for music "to carry away with delight, wonder, or rapture" that it is for it "to put into a trance". And it was a pleasant surprise to find a music page with a "trance" link that shouldn't be piped to "trance music". --Matthew Auger 08:41, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Svengruenberg.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Svengruenberg.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Chowbok ☠ 06:14, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've put the "disputed" tag. I've already broken my head with all that copyright stuff, maybe someone more competent can manage that? Efenstor 16:57, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Untagged image[edit]

An image you uploaded, Image:Krasnoyarsk coa 2004.gif, was tagged with the {{coatofarms}} copyright tag. This tag was deleted because it does not actually specify the copyright status of the image. The image may need a more accurate copyright tag, or it may need to be deleted. If the image portrays a seal or emblem, it should be tagged as {{seal}}. If you have any questions, ask them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. -- 17:47, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Krasnoyarsk_coa_1804.gif[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Krasnoyarsk_coa_1804.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:42, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:CavaleraRootsBloodyRoots.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:CavaleraRootsBloodyRoots.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 11:50, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Efenstor[edit]

A tag has been placed on Efenstor, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. RJASE1 ^Talk 03:31, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Talesaleandfire.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Talesaleandfire.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:55, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Odda mailbmi shot.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading Image:Odda mailbmi shot.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:49, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Talesaleandfire.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Talesaleandfire.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:12, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Shamaniac bigcover.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Shamaniac bigcover.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 00:38, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tuatha de Danann (band)[edit]

The article Tuatha de Danann (band) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable obscure band. Tagged since 2010.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 14:10, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]