User talk:Emirgan1980

Your recent edits[edit]

Kermanshahi's source it is no:14 PRO-PKK web site (The PKK is listed as a terrorist organization internationally) that source says "kurds 25 million in Turkey" ... ASK: We can add every source ????)

All sirius searches say that kurds in Turkey between 11.4 - 14 million %15-%18 census sources and CIA factbook and other university researches.

we must add these sources not PRO-PKK sites or political propoganda materials.

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you.

some user add PRO-PKK (Terrorist organisation) web site as source... I ask you that qouestiın it s so easyh , can I add AL-QAIDA sources on Afganistan War ? AL-QAIDA says that we killed 10.000 american soldiers ... if some one add pro-pkk not objettive sources everybody can add all terrorist site sources

 --SineBot (talk) 10:52, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

August 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Western Asia, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Muhandes (talk) 08:10, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kurdish people[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Omar-Toons (talk) 21:14, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kurdish people[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
Editors violating the rule will usually be blocked for 24 hours for a first incident.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording, and content that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Boolyme ^Chat!! 21:40, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

February 2011[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kurdish people, you may be blocked from editing. Discuss on talk page. In case of references saying different things, its better to remove the section itself. Boolyme ^Chat!! 11:57, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Egypt. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Kansas Bear (talk) 19:50, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Egypt, you may be blocked from editing. --Kansas Bear (talk) 01:18, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Egypt, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Kansas Bear (talk) 18:58, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Egypt, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Kansas Bear (talk) 23:08, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Careful[edit]

Do not use your own peculiar definitions of "vandalism." Use talkpages. Stay civil. Thank you. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 07:31, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

On the other hand, this edit of yours is vandalism. The dab-headers are there for a reason, as are the other templates. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 07:35, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Warning against personal attacks[edit]

You will receive one warning from me regarding your statement, Kansas Bear's anti-Turk propaganda.... Another personal attack from you will result in the notification of an Admin. --Kansas Bear (talk) 23:08, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011[edit]

Blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a suspected sock puppet of Siksok (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If you are a sock puppet, and your original account is blocked, please also note that banned or blocked users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; if you are banned, all edits under this account may be reverted.

If you are not a sock puppet, and would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Gyrofrog (talk) 20:18, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]