User talk:Greeneto

Howdy and welcome to Wikipedia! I noticed your edit on the Hopeful Monster article. I agree that I think the prior version represented a creationist view. I have gone ahead and restored what I think was the article prior to the creationist rewrite, feel free to look it over. To restore old versions (called reverting) look at the history tab. There you can see every revision the article has gone through. If you want to restore an old version,

1. under "History", click on the date/time of the version you want. This brings up the page as it once appeared.
2. Click "edit this page." A warning should be at the top of the page indicating you are editing an old version. No need to modify the text.
3. Add an edit summary indicating revert and reason (like "revert, vandalism" or "rv to last edit by Bcasterline.") and click save.
4. Check the saved page is what you expect.

In general, you should never revert a page more than three times in one day. More information can be found at WP:REVERT.

I have gone ahead and attached a welcome message below, since it has some useful links. Feel free to write a note on my talk page if I can help with anything. Well done and again, welcome to Wikipedia. --TeaDrinker 00:23, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, Greeneto, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! 

Notability of Eventum

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Eventum, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Eventum seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Eventum, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 17:30, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

File:Charles Darwin2sm.gif listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Charles Darwin2sm.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ~ JohnnyMrNinja 05:28, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Eventum

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Eventum, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

No sources (let alone substantial coverage in reliable third-party sources), no articulation of notability

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Hrafn^Talk_Stalk^(P) 17:46, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Greeneto. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)