User talk:JasonBludd

Unblock Me[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JasonBludd (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I know in the past I have harassed other Users, I apologise sincerely with my heart and promise not to do it again

Decline reason:

I am willing to assume good faith that your apology is sincere; however, before unblocking you also need to demonstrate you understand our copyright policy. Given the number of notices on your talkpage, I want to be sure you've actually read the notices you've been given. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 04:05, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

JasonBludd _Talk 18:51, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm a uninvolved editor and I saw your unblock request. I would like to know what caused you to want to regain editing privileges after 8 months of being blocked? Having being blocked for disruptive editing and vile personal attacks what has changed? Please be aware that by making this request, you're asking for a length of rope therefore it would be a wise idea to be very careful about any promises you make in your unblock as you will be held to them. Hasteur (talk) 12:54, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

_JasonBludd Hello Hasteur, when I actually made myself a Wikipedia account, I took it as a joke and thought of it as "part time fun", but now have realised that it is actually for something. I wish to edit Wikipedia pages appropriately now as I have found out what the true purpose of a 'wiki' is. I would write this in your (talk) but I am blocked and hope that you'll come across this message. Jason (talk) 19:16, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You realize that if you are unblocked, your behavior must be exemplary, or you will be blocked again? KillerChihuahua^?!? 21:44, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JasonBludd (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I Understand Copyright: * You retain copyright to materials you contribute to Wikipedia, text and media. Copyright is never transferred to Wikipedia. * All creative works are copyrighted, by international agreement, unless either they fall into the public domain or their copyright is explicitly disclaimed. * Never use materials that infringe the copyrights of others. * If you suspect a copyright violation, you should at least bring up the issue on that page's discussion page. * Images, photographs, video and sound files, like written works, are subject to copyright. * Questions about media copyright may be directed to Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. JasonBludd (talk) 11:09, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Copy/pasting from policies certainly is the opposite of proving that you understand copyright - it's actually for all intents and purposes a copyright violation of its own! Read WP:GAB - you need to show that you understand all the reasons you were blocked, and prove that they won't recur. (✉→BWilkins←✎) 11:56, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JasonBludd (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand what I have done and realise it was wrong and my block should be reversed because I will not harass users again. If I do you can block me permanently and remember what I have said JasonBludd (talk) 12:27 pm, Today (UTC+0)

Decline reason:

As BWilkins has pointed out, your understanding or lack thereof regarding Wikipedia's copyright policies is an issue that needs to be addressed before an unblock is considered. Any future unblock request will need to demonstrate that you both understand and intend to abide by the copyright requirements here. As has also been explained above, copying and pasting chunks of text from the copyright policy is just about the worst way you could choose to do this. Your current unblock request gives no indication that you have improved your comprehension of the rules. Yunshui 雲‍水 14:17, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.