User talk:Jude12309

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Jude12309, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 05:13, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

February 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add content (particularly if you change facts and figures), as you have to the article Alison Sweeney, please cite a reliable source for the content you're adding or changing. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:19, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jude12309. You have new messages at Talk:Alison Sweeney.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Alison Sweeney. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:39, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously, there is discussion on the talk page, please join in. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:39, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure why you insist in engaging in an edit war. Try using the talk page. The version you prefer will not result without discussion. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 19:08, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours to prevent further disruption caused by your engagement in an edit war at Alison Sweeney. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Sandstein 06:02, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing at Alison Sweeney. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:24, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Sandstein 13:09, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

All your edits so far consist in edit-warring to include information that violates pur policy WP:BLP. You have not reacted to our previous warnings. You are therefore indefinitely blocked until you convince us that you understand the problem with your edits and will make constructive contributions instead. Sandstein 13:11, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]