User talk:JulieBrandy

December 2007[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Flump (sweet), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Flump (sweet) was changed by JulieBrandy (c) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2007-12-30T23:45:19+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 23:45, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

January 2008[edit]

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Cockermouth. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. Thank you. Tiddly-Tom 10:36, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. In fact, all of your edits except, possibly, this one, qualify as explicit vandalism, and have been reverted. (I'm just not sure about that one, but it's too complicated to revert). — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 14:30, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. (talk) 17:03, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

— Arthur Rubin | (talk) 17:03, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

El Badi Palace[edit]

Hi. Can you tell me why you have restored the obviously wrong information that the Palace in Marrakech is over 5000 years old (plus some additional absurds about the snake and Adam and Eve)? If this palace was build by the Saadian king Ahmed el-Mansour, how can it be that old? That information is sheer, obvious nonsense added by a person with just one edit on Wikipedia. --BotevFixer (talk) 16:28, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]