User talk:KoliaGeorgian

Source?[edit]

Do you have any reliable sources that prove that L-29 were scrapped? If you have, then I'll add to the former list of equipment page instead. Mr. Komori (talk) 00:04, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Other then some magazine book that doesn't contain any evidence to the existence of the said aircraft is there anything else that proves they are still in service? The last public image of the Georgian L-29's were taken over a decade ago and there is no evidence pointing to its existence anymore. KoliaGeorgian (talk) 12:09, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I should have added the note: "4 aircraft in service as of December 2022" (emphasis mine). There is consensus that FlightGlobal's World Air Force magazine is a reliable source. Being an annual publication is not 100% accurate after its publication date, but it's still a pretty good source of information. Keeping in mind of WP:NOTNEWS.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_83#World_Air_Forces_directory_2010

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_360#World_Air_Force_directory_published_by_Magazine_Flight_Global_(user_generated)_is_this_a_reliable_source

I would keep it at least until the next edition no longer lists them as in active service. That sounds like a fair and reasonable compromise, no? Mr. Komori (talk) 22:07, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I believe there is no point of having them on the page as like you said yourself they are not 100% accurate and there hasn't been any evidence of the planes being in Georgian arsenal since more then a decade ago. KoliaGeorgian (talk) 00:32, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Leri Tchitanava (May 24)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JJPMaster was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Leri Tchitanava and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

JJP_{Mas_ter} (she/they) 03:44, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, KoliaGeorgian! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! JJP_{Mas_ter} (she/they) 03:44, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]