User talk:Marchpig

Image copyright problem with Image:AlbumArt -DDBD3573-570B-4BBB-9D44-D3571EBDA28D- Large.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:AlbumArt -DDBD3573-570B-4BBB-9D44-D3571EBDA28D- Large.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 00:44, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

December 2012[edit]

Hello, I'm Moe Epsilon. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Gary Burns (activist) because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Regards, — Moe Epsilon 05:20, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Gary Burns (activist). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Gary Burns (activist) was changed by Marchpig (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.956876 on 2012-12-04T07:50:19+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 07:50, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Gary Burns (activist), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Legoktm (talk) 07:50, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. - 28bytes (talk) 08:48, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Marchpig (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The Wiki page I am accused of vandalising was erroneous to begin with, it is a page about a [redacted], anyway, after receiving the warnings I desisted, but it would appear that this person or persons connected to him have maliciously reported me further, any logs you keep will point out that I did in fact cease any edit activity to that persons page. Summation: I would appreciate being unblocked so as to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, I promise to leave the offended page alone. ThankyouMarchpig (talk) 23:04, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Since you violated the very policy you've violated before in your unblock request, I've revoked your right to edit this page. Max Semenik (talk) 08:21, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

We take living peoples' biographies very seriously. My guess is you were blocked because that edit was so bad that it necessitated being removed. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 04:25, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]