User talk:Mathsci/Jeremy Dunning-Davies

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography NA‑class

	Biography portal This page is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
NA	This page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

{Physics|class=Draft|importance=low|bio=yes}

This user page was nominated for deletion on 14 June 2009. The result of the discussion was delete.

Jeremy Dunning-Davies[edit]

(moved from User talk:Headbomb) Headbomb {^ταλκ_{κοντριβς} – WP Physics} 07:44, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How does this differ from the deleted article? My first response is that it should be speedy deleted as a recreation of an article deleted by AfD. Dougweller (talk) 20:31, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've expanded it, added information about his work at CERN, worded things more neutrally and so on. I checked with other people first, and they said they feel it's a good enough expansion to avoid getting speedied, so I moved it into the mainspace. Headbomb {^ταλκ_{κοντριβς} – WP Physics} 20:54, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think it would be useful to say something on the article's talk page about how you see it to be different. As the Admin who closed the AfD seems happy, I'll leave it to other editors to decide whether it is sufficiently different. Dougweller (talk) 07:39, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. I moved the discussion here. Headbomb {^ταλκ_{κοντριβς} – WP Physics} 07:45, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I was about to delete this under WP:G4 until I saw this discussion; the new version of the article does not establish that the topic meets WP:PROF or the WP:GNG, and seems to defy the outcome of the deletion discussion. Skomorokh 14:10, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Skomorokh. Dougweller has also written here that he hasn't noticed any appreciable changes or expansion [1]. The statement about cold fusion seems just to be wrong and unsupported by the link, which is not a WP:RS of any kind (the Telesio-Galilei Institute in East Croydon or possibly Hungary). Mathsci (talk) 22:40, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]