User talk:Mdswbkq

Wilkinson Barker Knauer[edit]

I have restored this article, and the logo. I see that you have already read our COI policy, so I wont bash you over the head with it. I've asked a query on the talk page, and I'll do my best to expand the article with any verifiable information that you mention on the talk page. Thank you for your contributions. John Vandenberg ^(chat) 07:27, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, John. I appreciate it. As you know, I'm trying to help the Wiki project, especially in the legal and telecom area, and I'm encouraging folks from the firm to help as well. Time will tell. Michael D. Sullivan (talk) 07:47, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ive left notes on Talk:Wilkinson Barker Knauer and Image talk:Wbklawlogo.gif‎. --John Vandenberg ^(chat) 09:56, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Responses left. Michael D. Sullivan (talk) 21:17, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An associate of yours?[edit]

Hi, I'm not sure if you are or were an associate of Wilkinson Barker Knauer, but I thought I might draw your attention to a request for editor assistance which has apparently been made by another person presently employed there: WP:EAR#Wikipedia article on Kathleen Q. Abernathy. I figured that if you're acquainted with the filing editor professionally, you might be in a better position to advise him and help him acclimate to how things work on Wikipedia. Just a friendly "heads-up", of course. —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 21:27, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I'm a partner at Wilkinson Barker Knauer and appreciate the heads up. I'll talk to Louis. Michael D. Sullivan (talk) 22:55, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Sorry if I got your relationship to Wilkinson Barker Knauer wrong- being a layperson I'm not familiar with the ins and outs of professional partnerships. Also, as I noted at WP:EAR, I'd like to make it clear that I'm not writing to complain about Louis' edits at all- just that, as I presume you know him personally or professionally, and you've experience editing on Wikipedia, you'll probably be able to more expediently convey the more important points. —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 00:39, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Wilkinson Barker Knauer[edit]

The article Wilkinson Barker Knauer has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back. Thank you,

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 02:35, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]