User talk:NATNUN

DUDE WHAT ARE WE GOING TO DO[edit]

We don't have the tools to stop the vandalism on flat basketball player's page. WHAT ARE WE GONNA DO?!? BeerPizzaCoffeeWeed (talk) 22:04, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello BeerPizzaCoffeeWeed, are you talking about football player Karim Benzema? --NATNUN (talk) 22:05, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. BeerPizzaCoffeeWeed (talk) 22:06, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well... According to Wikipedia:Vandalism, we can "report vandals that continue their behavior after being warned to Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. While not strictly required, administrators there are most likely to respond rapidly to requests which include at least two warnings, culminating in the level-four "last chance" template". --NATNUN (talk) 22:11, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022[edit]

Hello. Thank you for your anti-vandalism efforts. Regarding the recent reverts you made: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template index/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. Kpddg ^(talk ^• ^contribs) 04:16, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Kpddg, thank you very much for your advice. I will take it into consideration for the near future. --NATNUN (talk) 04:21, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. Warning users who make disruptive edits will be beneficial, and repeated vandalism can be reported at WP:AIV. For warning and reporting, WP:Twinkle is a very useful tool. Kpddg ^(talk ^• ^contribs) 04:34, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NATNUN (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is 186.4.79.200. Place any further information here.--NATNUN (talk) 17:11, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As noted this account isn't blocked, so I can't unblock it. I can tell you to either edit (at least temporarily) from a device on another IP, or go to WP:IPECPROXY and request IP block exemption via the link on that page. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:39, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NATNUN (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is 186.4.79.205. Place any further information here. NATNUN (talk) 13:47, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Though the IP is different, the advice is the same as above. 331dot (talk) 19:37, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your unmotivated revert[edit]

Would you care to at least explain your revert of my carefully commented change? 172.82.46.195 (talk) 23:03, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Argentina Independence Day[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Argentina Independence Day. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Independence Day (Argentina). Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Independence Day (Argentina). If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Daiyusha (talk) 09:11, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Daiyusha, thank you for the notice. I know there can't be two articles with the same information on Wikipedia. In fact, I looked to see if there were any in Spanish on the subject but I didn't find any, so I translated. Thank you very much for letting me know. --NATNUN (talk) 03:15, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop with the unexplained reverts[edit]

"Anti-vandalism" is not an excuse for messing up. This is just plainly the kind of content that is explicitly excluded by WP:NOTDIRECTORY. Stop adding it back in. 107.190.33.254 (talk) 16:26, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of MD Marketing Digital[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on MD Marketing Digital, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 03:27, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about MD Marketing Digital[edit]

Hello, NATNUN, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username SunDawn, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, MD Marketing Digital, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MD Marketing Digital.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 19:02, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]