User talk:Ncperng
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Genesys Logic, Inc., and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.genesyslogic.com.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 02:39, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Genesys Logic, Inc.[edit]
A tag has been placed on Genesys Logic, Inc., requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Deutschgirl (talk) 02:41, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
FYI conflict of interest guideline[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia in Genesys Logic, Inc. or other articles, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
- editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
- participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
- linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. – Athaenara ✉ 02:59, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
Notability of Genesys Logic, Inc.[edit]
You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.
Thank you.
The article Genesys Logic, Inc. has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, individual animal, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.
Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. —C.Fred (talk) 04:16, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
- In reply to a couple of points from the message you left on my talk page:
- Could you please let us know how to prove our notability to let our information stay in Wikipedia?
- WP:CORP spells out the guidelines for notability of corporations. Additionally, the general notability guidelines state that any subject should be backed up by independent reliable sources. So, the easiest way to prove notability is to provide references to newspaper and magazine articles or similar coverage in secondary sources. Note that it should be substantial coverage—a mere mention of the company's name is not sufficient; the article should be written about the company.
- We also found a similar company JMicron…
- Other stuff exists. The existence of an article on a similar subject is not a reason to create an article about a related subject.
- …and they do have their own page to express their company even the product list on Wikipedia.
- There is no evidence that the JMicron article was written by employees or other parties with a conflict of interest. It's arguable that the product list shouldn't be in the article. However, the remainder of the article is written neutrally and calls upon outside sources. Not all of the sources are secondary, but the DailyTech reference is the one that, in my opinion, shows enough independent coverage to meet the general notability guidelines.
- Finally, I notice the frequency with which you call Genesys Logic "our company." Clearly you have a conflict of interest with the company. While this does not prevent you from writing about the company, it does put a little bit higher burden on you to make sure that your contributions are written neutrally and that any claims about awards and the like are backed up by independent sources. —C.Fred (talk) 04:33, 20 September 2010 (UTC)