User talk:NightFlyer

Ejaculation image

Not sure what you are talking about. The only change I made was this one: [1] Not sure how that can alter an image. —Ocatecir ^Talk 18:57, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Diagram of the Male Reproductive System

Hello NightFlyer
Would it be possible for you to load the Image up to http://commons.wikimedia.org?
I'd like to use it because it's a good illustration, but you're the "owner" of it...
Thanks
Marc

I thought you were a troll. Smurai Chaos Wolf☃ 14:40, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

Naturism

Hi, I saw you had posted a question on Clem Rutter's talk page re the removal of an image. Just to let you know that Clem may not be quick to respond as he has posted recently that he will be away for a month. He might be able to access the internet while away but if he doesn't reply at least you will now know why he hasn't replied. Mjroots (talk) 07:56, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

Hi. Naturism illustrations. Mike was right I was at Montalivet and my emplacement is outside the area covered by WiFi. Apologies if I was a little rough. As the history shows I have been 'watchng" or policing this article for several years. Images have in the past been a major problem, because quite frankly some editors thought it a great joke to use it as a gallery of tits and bums. When one image appeared- then others followed and for a period of time the article was unusable and brought Wikipedia into disrepute. So I jump in quickly- and though I will advocate more images in most articles- in this case, less is more. I am believe that images should be included to clarify- and in this case the image does not tell you anything interesting extra about the topic of garden naturism.

So why did I jump on this particular image. To me it was posed to display a flacid penis. This was placed right in the centre of the image, and arranged for maximum effect. The hat was used to conceal identity to a textilist audience- which would be most unlikely in a genuine naturist context. As the shot must have been taken with a timer; it is highly contrived. In garden naturism, a towel is usually on hand to act as a wrap, in case the door bell goes, or the telephone or you just need to walk inside for beer. The guy looks to be enjoying himself harmlessly on his decking and it is an image I would encourage on other articles, and definitely on commons but I would expect that the model was correctly identified and a geotag would be useful.

Back to the point of identification- I reckon that there is enough of the body shown to allow identification in say a police lineout.

Photography is frowned upon in naturist sites, and forbidden in most. If you do look through a naturists holiday album, it usually group shots, three quarter length shots and while genitalia will appear, they are never the subject of the shot. In a garden there are obviously no clear criteria but to display such an image sends warning signals.

So there are a few of the reasons, and bearing in mind the majoriy of our readers will be textilists- I don´t believe we should compromise the integrity of the article by displaying an image that would cause concern to naturists.

However, it may improve the article Deck (building)- well perhaps not.

--ClemRutter (talk) 12:07, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

We must meet up for a drink sometime.

--ClemRutter (talk) 08:36, 1 October 2009 (UTC)