User talk:Noitadnuof
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of London health sciences foundation, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.linkedin.com/companies/london-health-sciences-foundation. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:50, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content (particularly if you change facts and figures), as you have to the article London, Ontario, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Deconstructhis (talk) 16:21, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to London health sciences foundation, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Deconstructhis (talk) 16:34, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
Are you associated in any way with the Foundation? I ask because your user name is "Foundation" spelled backwards and you seem to have only edited on this one subject. If so, you may want to take a look at wp:coi. If not, sorry to have bothered you. Rees11 (talk) 16:35, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
Your addition to London, Ontario has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Deconstructhis (talk) 22:18, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
Copyright problems[edit]
Hello. I have restored the copyright problem template to the article London Health Sciences Foundation. I performed a search of the OTRS system for the words "London Health Sciences Foundation", but found no matches. Until permission is verified, we cannot publish that text. If you can advise me of exact text used in your permission letter, I may be able to locate it and expedite the verification process.
I see that subsequent to creating this article, you also copied text into London, Ontario from [1]. Unless the release we receive from this organization licenses all of their material or generally authorizes you to license their material (complicated, but not impossible), we will need to verify permission each time text is placed.
I will be watching your page for about a week as I wait for further word on this particular article and will see any questions you leave me here. Alternatively, you are welcome at any time to come by my talk page, which can be reached by following the "talk" after my username. Thank you. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:43, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
Update regarding copyright concern[edit]
Since we do not yet have verification of permission by the processes set out above and sufficient time has passed since the placement of the notice, the article has been deleted for copyright concerns. This deletion is not necessarily permanent. If you have already sent a letter to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) and GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) (if you are not the copyright holder or have co-authored the material, release under CC-BY-SA-compatible license alone is sufficient), the article will be restored when that letter is received and processed by the Wikimedia Communications committee. Likewise, if you have not yet sent a letter, you still may (or resend it, if you believe your original may have been lost), and the article will be restored when that letter is received and processed.
As Wikipedia does not require proof of identity on account creation, it is essential that we receive external proof of authorization in order to ensure that we remain compliant with US Copyright law. It is also essential that we verify that copyright holders understand the extent of the release they are authorizing, in that our licenses permit modification and reuse in any forum, even commercial publication, as long as authorship credit is maintained and future copies are compatibly licensed.
Please note that once permission is verified, the material may be evaluated and altered to meet Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Although we appreciate donations, we cannot guarantee that material donated will be retained.
Thank you. Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:10, 10 March 2010 (UTC)