User talk:Onesmallnote

Your recent edits[edit]

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 15:37, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Respect intellectual property rights - do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view when editing articles - this is possibly the most important Wikipedia policy.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Adding such information or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism, doing so will result your account being blocked from editing.

The Wikipedia Tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Marlith (Talk) 03:50, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Dancing with the Stars (U.S. season 8) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. §hawn poo 02:10, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Leader Board[edit]

I chose to take the "Leader Board" off because I felt having it would be too forum-ish for Wikipedia. Please do not add it again. —Mythdon (talk) 06:23, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Biggest Loser[edit]

	The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
	For your tireless work on The Biggest Loser articles. Plastikspork (talk) 20:39, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're really fast at keeping the biggest loser page updated. Great Job.

DWTS[edit]

Note: Sorry for the warning. I made a mistake; it was that annoying IP address who added the excess, not you =).

You are doing fantastic work with the article. Did you want to keep the footnotes? What I suggest you do instead is include a brief recap above each individual week's chart to summarize the judges' opinions.--Cinemaniac⁸⁶_{Dane_Cook_Hater_Extraordinaire} 01:14, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Dancing with the Stars (U.S. season 10)[edit]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Dancing with the Stars (U.S. season 10). We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dancing with the Stars (U.S. season 10). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:22, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

futile edits[edit]

Edits such as this are futile, as you're working against how automates tools work. The next pass with the ref links tool will undo it all. The problem is that it's deprecated code. You should adopt CSS. Jack Merridew 04:23, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Secret Life[edit]

Hey, I noticed that you edited the Secret Life articles a lot recently. If you have anything that could improve the latest episode recap, feel free to add it. It would be appreciated. Thanks! ChaosMaster_Chat 02:12, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dancing with the Stars Season 11[edit]

He was merely pointing out the difficulty in casting for this season. I have undone your revert. Rio de Janiero God —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rio de Janiero God (talk • contribs) 00:29, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

THNX[edit]

Thanks for your work on tv-related articles. Admirable. Keep it up and I'll find ya a barnstar or something. Guiltlessgecko (talk) 05:00, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Averages[edit]

OK. I still think it is bizzare because the dance is counted twice. TDI19 (talk) 00:45, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome and I understand the confusion with it! Don't the producers know that there are people who have to analyze their scoring? :D TDI19 (talk) 01:21, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think getting rid of the guest judge score is the best way. All of them are going to be giving 10s clearly. TDI19 (talk) 01:01, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, both of the best dance charts. So, for Kyle's his best is now '25', and also note the change! :) TDI19 (talk) 01:17, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Color charts[edit]

Hi, you reverted a large edit I made without giving any reason. Marked (talk) 23:31, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Because there was no reason to change the colors. And you didn't explain why you did. The charts on all the seasons have the same color codings. They were fine and easy to see. Why change it? Onesmallnote (talk) 23:46, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

So the current colors are too similar, seem to be randomly chosen, and are inconsistent to the other tables on the same page. I did spend a good amount of time finding a set of colors that would be distinguishable and logically connected. Please take a serious look at the final combination as I think they're better, and I can apply to the other seasons if that's the remaining issue. Marked (talk) 00:05, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, sure, why not. You seem really determined, and it's not critical enough to argue about, so whatever. Go ahead. And yes, please change all the other seasons for the sake of continuity. Onesmallnote (talk) 01:46, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]