User talk:Ozmaweezer

Welcome to Wikipedia and thanks for your contributions such as this. --JWSchmidt 01:57, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Medical technologist

I don't think it's very helpful to add a "see also" for medical technologist to every article on medical laboratory investigations. Woulnd't it make more sense to integrate this fact into the article text ("the test is performed in the medical laboratory by a medical technologist - [or at the point-of-care by nurses or doctors]"). I would also suggest you make the article more international by merging relevant content from biomedical scientist, which presently tries inadequately to explain the UK situation.

Let me know if you have any questions. JFW | T@lk 18:10, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

I agree - I was rather surprised to see you'd added it to the article on ISEs. Medical technologists may use them, but it's not a directly related concept and it doesn't seem to explain much about the electrodes themselves... Jaeger5432 | Talk 19:53, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

Trivia canvassing

Just noting that your comment at Wikipedia talk:Trivia sections#Show your support for trivia, add your name to the list contains a statement which seems to be encouraging people to act directly against the established behavior guideline at WP:CANVASSING, specifically "send this link to other users that you feel would be interested". You may wish to remove that comment. John Carter 21:50, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

Created the Trivia project

Inspired by your initiative, I created Wikipedia:WikiProject Trivia and Popular Culture. I hope you don't think of this as my stealing your thunder; I just know more about how to get such a project off the ground, so I did it. I don't intend to "lead" the project, not that Wikipedia has leaders anyway. I look forward to working with you on this issue.--Father Goose 23:22, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

Hey Ozmaweezer, thanks for letting me know about this project. I'd been voicing this opinion on various articles and its good to have a central place we can coordinate from. Think outside the box 10:29, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Re: Trivia

Hi, I hope this isn't canvassing but I was wondering if you would be interested in this Wikipedia:WikiProject Trivia and Popular Culture. If not, could you share this link with editors you think may be interested. Thanks Ozmaweezer 13:37, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Well, even if the first bit wasn't canvassing, the second bit definitely is. There are better ways to promote a project. Please leave me alone. Thanks – Gurch 17:03, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Also, where on earth did you get your spam list from? I mean, Brad Patrick? ... – Gurch 17:05, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:22, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Ozmaweezer. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Ozmaweezer. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)