User talk:Paullillyusa
If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
- editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
- participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
- linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam); and,
- avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for businesses. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. ➨ ❝ЯEDVERS❞ a reasonably good buy 22:55, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
Notability of Chief Paul D. Lilly[edit]
A tag has been placed on Chief Paul D. Lilly requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Eeekster (talk) 23:14, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
About the hangon tag[edit]
You only need to place the hangon tag once per article. It's only used to dispute the speedy deletion, not the other templates. Themfromspace (talk) 00:51, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
January 2009[edit]
The recent edit you made to User:Jusjih constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 03:07, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
re: legal threats made against editors[edit]
According to the edits made here and here, you are in violation of WP:THREAT, which prohibits threatening to take legal action against fellow editors.
Based on this policy, you have engaged in uncivil behavior. I strongly encourage you to self refactor these "notices" immediately. continued disruption and threats of this nature may lead to this account being blocked with little or no further warning. LonelyBeacon (talk) 05:00, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
