User talk:Prodirman

December 2012[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Clue (musical), you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 22:29, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Clue (musical) with this edit, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Widr (talk) 22:46, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 23:14, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Musical theatre articles[edit]

Hello, Prodirman. The editors who contribute to musical theatre articles have long considered a description of historical productions to be an important part of an article about a work of musical theatre. See WP:MUSICALS' article structure guidelines for more information about information that generally should be described in a musical theatre article. The brief section at the top of each Wikipedia article is called the Wp:LEAD, and it presents merely a brief overview of the article's content. Then more detailed information is given in the sections below. For a good example of a musical theatre article, see Carousel (musical). That is the kind of article that we aspire to. The commentary of newspaper critics with respect to a musical are of interest to readers. As you are a new editor here, I suggest that you read some of the WP:Featured Articles in your areas of interest to see what is commonly included in the best Wikipedia articles. Featured articles have been reviewed by numerous experienced editors and have been considered among the best in this encyclopedia. Generally speaking, deleting references to published sources is not a good idea. All the best. -- Ssilvers (talk) 20:31, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Clue (musical), you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 20:47, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Clue (musical), you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Clue (musical) was changed by Prodirman (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.954933 on 2012-12-20T21:18:08+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:18, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 22:44, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]