User talk:Rhys Mayall

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Teahouse logo

Hi Rhys Mayall! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like GreenMeansGo (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:30, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

Warning[edit]

You will be block for disrupting edits Jozamba (talk) 16:41, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Britpop[edit]

Seeing as you think your changes to Britpop should stay, rather than plunge into an edit war, I thought I'd try discussing this.

Basically I think a lot of what you added to this article about Britpop is more about the Blur and Oasis rivalry. Does knowing about Britpop really need us to know that Alex James wore an Oasis shirt during a performance? Is Damon and Noel becoming friends way after 2000 relevant to a movement that was confined to the 1990s? Oasis 'roasting' Blur at the Brit Awards doesn't have much bearing on Britpop as a whole, nor do Definitely Maybe's total sales figures (some of which would've been after 2000).

I was/am willing to keep a few things you added, but I still feel a lot of it's unnecessary or even irrelevant.

Kohran (talk) 19:35, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I didn’t add “roasting” (although I agree with it). Since Britpop was regarded as a “cultural phenomenon”, giving a broader perspective than just ‘X sold this, Y sold that’, I think is appropriate. See the Oasis article, it has a NY Times piece on the band being on the front pages of tabloids as much as royalty. The rivalry ramped up the whole scene tenfold, and performances on the country’s biggest chart show, and awards show, helped fuel it. Rhys Mayall (talk) 13:56, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pelé[edit]

Hi. The story of the ceasefire is not true. It appeared for the first time in a brazilian magazine in the 70s, Pelé believed it (because he didn't see any fire and seemed true) and included it in his two autobiographies. But locals in Nigeria have checked the press of the time and there is no mention of the alleged ceasefire. --Jbaranao (talk) 18:15, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Liverpool[edit]

I pinged you on my talk page to have a discussion regarding the lead of Liverpool F.C. See: User talk:9XY#Lead expansion of Liverpool F.C. regarding 6th Champions League title. 9XY (talk) 16:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

UEFA rankings (Liverpool)[edit]

I noticed that most major clubs have UEFA coefficient rankings on there page but Liverpool were an exception. 9XY removed it on the grounds that it was unimportant and biased. however I see nothing wrong with it and if it's not suitable for Liverpool then why is it on all the other club's pages? REDMAN 2019 (talk) 11:52, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:00, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]