User talk:Rob ryan92
 | Rob_ryan92 is taking a short wikibreak and will be back on Wikipedia soon! |
Welcome!
April 2012[edit]
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to User:Jimbo Wales, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Per WP:NOBAN, editing others' user pages is strongly discouraged. Please do not attempt to improve others' user pages, no matter the motivation. BusterD (talk) 01:33, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User:Jimbo Wales, you may be blocked from editing. BusterD (talk) 01:34, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
Sorry. If Jimmy says edit to your heart's content, who am I to say otherwise. It's still not the best place to learn. If I can be of assistance while you're learning to edit, please visit me on my talk page. BusterD (talk) 01:37, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
A bowl of strawberries for you![edit]
|
Hi! Rob ryan92 (talk) 01:42, 8 April 2012 (UTC) |
Your comment says 'to Media of Portland' (where it already is), so it took me a moment to understand what you meant. There are three choices: 1) Wikipedia:Be bold, matching the other articles in the category 2) File at Wikipedia:Requested moves, which lists for a week, may relist for additional weeks 3) wait for consensus on the talk page, which may generate responses quickly now that you've listed it in Category:Wikipedians looking for help, currently the only one. I don't see a problem with moving it, as the title style is well established by the consistency of the other articles, and each path has benefits and drawbacks. The worst that is likely to happen is a discussion or a long wait. Good luck. Dru of Id (talk) 03:52, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)