User talk:Skberry889

Welcome!

Hello, Skberry889, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to Montana Republican Party does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! – S. Rich (talk) 23:25, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Helllo. I realize you are new. I've "reverted" the platform edit you made. Please have another go at it. We must edit in WP:SUMMARYSTYLE and avoid editorializing in our material. Thanks. – S. Rich (talk) 23:28, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014[edit]

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Tim Griffin, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". More guidance. When other editors look at what you've done they will consider if the edit is "minor" in the page history. In the Griffin edit you did more than just correct a tpyo. Thanks. – S. Rich (talk) 23:37, 6 August 2014 (UTC) Thanks for the tip. Skberry889 (talk) 02:59, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Starr Report may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

a whole and under Rule 413, which allows questioning about separate allegations of sexual assault (which was never asserted about Lewinsky's relationship with Clinton.<ref>{{cite web | title=
//www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/clinton/stories/clintondep031398.htm | publisher= [[Washington Post] | accessdate= 2014-08-08}}</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:23, 8 August 2014 (UTC) Thanks talking robot. Please don't kill me when skynet goes active. Skberry889 (talk) 02:59, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Presuppositional apologetics[edit]

Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Criticism sections really need citations, since they are most likely to be contested. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! Onel5969 (talk) 12:50, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal to split Rape shield laws article[edit]

This comment is regarding your proposal to split the Rape shield laws article into two articles.

I don't think there should be a split. Rape shield laws dealing with the prohibition of using the victim's sexual history during a criminal trial. The Publication bans article deals with prohibitions on the disclosure of a victim's identity.

Rape shield laws are: "statutes which restrict or prohibit the use of evidence respecting the chastity of the victim of a are of other sexual offence" - Black's Law Dictionary

User:WSDavittWSDavitt (talk) 22:50, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]