User talk:Teresacoffman

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

April 2009[edit]

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content, as you did to User:Your username/your course name. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalized, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. Banaticus (talk) 21:07, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, Teresacoffman, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.

My apologies for that earlier post, I really shouldn't have suggested redirecting that article, I didn't notice that it was in userspace. Isn't Leadership in Eductional Technology somewhat of a nebulous concept? I just wanted to suggest that you have your student familiarize themselves with WP:NOR, meaning essentially that they write the article in a format suitable for an encyclopedia. ;) I'm happy that you'll be using the featured article criteria as a guide. If I can be of further assistance or can help explain any Wikipedia nuances, please feel free to let me know. :)

Happy editing! Banaticus (talk) 22:35, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

A tag has been placed on Leadership in Educational Technology requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. MuffledThud (talk) 21:14, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I know that you want to put a page with some guidelines on for your students to start with. Usually, Wikipedia policy is to discourage near-blank pages, to prevent Wikipedia being cluttered up with too many pages like that. As I understand it, thousands of new articles are created every day and approximately 80% of them are deleted. There are, however, still a very large number of articles that remain, large enough that it's been impossible for one person to possibly read all of Wikipedia -- the number of words increases faster than the fastest reader could read if they spent 24 hours a day every day reading Wikipedia. That's why the speedy delete rules are in place, to try to minimize the creation of so-called "junk" pages -- it all adds up to a significant amount of bandwidth and storage space. However, take a look at this page: Deenbandhu_Chhotu_Ram_University_of_Science_and_Technology. It's right on the borderline of whether it should have a speedy delete tag placed on it. But the single sentence says that it's a university (implicitly claims its importance) and the university has a link at the bottom.
Normally, when a person wants to create an article like that, they're encouraged to create it in their userspace, much like how you've put out your initial lesson plan. Here's a good page on what all you can put in your userspace. You might want students to create project pages in their (or your) userspace, put together whatever they want, then simply copy/paste into a new Wikipedia article or use the Move command to move the article. Banaticus (talk) 22:51, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Signatures[edit]

I noticed that, on my user talk page, you at first used a somewhat custom signature, although it didn't have a date stamp included. Did you know that you can set a custom signature which would be put in whenever you use four tildes ~~~~ ? You can set it in your Preferences page, also reachable from the "my preferences" link at the top of the page. Look at the signatures on Patton123's talk page for some good examples of what's possible: Timmeh, Patton, and Cyclonium. Basically, as long as you don't stuff "too much" code in, keep it to something that you could use more or less professionally (no raw porn, for instance), and include your linked name (in a more or less recognizable format), linked talk page and a date stemp, you can pretty much put it in whatever format you want. You can view more guidelines at the Wikipedia:Signatures page. Banaticus (talk) 21:50, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Link to your assignment article[edit]

Please wait until there is actual content in the Leadership in Educational Technology article before adding the link again. Right now, that link does not add any value to the Educational technology article. If the article you started survives speedy deletion and starts to contain useful information, the link would be welcome. As a personal note, I would strongly recommend that you spend some more time contributing to Wikipedia yourself before you try to manage a student project here. Many nuances of Wikipedia's culture and processes are challenging to understand until you've participated directly yourself. WeisheitSuchen (talk) 21:53, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:School_and_university_projects[edit]

This is probably just what you were looking for: Wikipedia:School_and_university_projects (I've only just become aware of it myself.) Happy editing and teaching! :) Banaticus (talk) 05:45, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]