User talk:Tiramisoo

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tiramisoo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i'm going to be watched like a hawk anyway, why "punish" me? just unblock me plz

Decline reason:

Administrative decline based on previous recent requests. Your requests to be unblocked have already been reviewed by two other editors in recent days. They both declined to unblock you. See User talk:HockeyLovingHoser. To shift to another one of your accounts and to request unblocking again is a type of forum shopping. (As was making the unblock request twice on consecutive days.) Please see the following from Wikipedia:GAB#Sockpuppetry_and_Checkuser-based_blocks: "If you actually are guilty of sockpuppetry, and want to get a second chance at editing, please do as follows: 1. Refrain from making any edits, using any account or anonymously, for a significant period of time. 2. Make the unblock request from your original account. Sockpuppeteers aren't often unblocked—since they've acted dishonestly, it's hard to believe them—but the administrators certainly aren't going to unblock the sockpuppet account." — Good Ol’factory ^(talk) 01:37, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I just saw that you are still editing, now evading the block by using User talk:209.237.85.14. This is not a good way to get reinstated, you know. Good Ol’factory ^(talk) 23:49, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Hipsters[edit]

Category:Hipsters, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. RepublicanJacobite_{The'FortyFive'} 14:06, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Songs from Donnie Darko[edit]

Category:Songs from Donnie Darko, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 22:43, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]