User talk:Tnarocks

Problems with upload of Image:Am2xzl.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Am2xzl.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 04:57, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

December 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Deuce 'n Domino has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Versus22 (talk) 09:24, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Deuce 'n Domino constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Versus22 (talk) 09:26, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

School number[edit]

Please note that a "school number", used for school templates, is a number defined by a government body to uniquely identify the school. It is not a phone number. For VanKleek Hill, you can find it listed at the Ontario Ministry of Education site right here. Please don't remove this info from the table. Mind matrix 15:35, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:EricSinger09.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:EricSinger09.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Closedmouth (talk) 07:16, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:PeterCriss.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:PeterCriss.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Closedmouth (talk) 07:17, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:PStanley.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:PStanley.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Closedmouth (talk) 07:17, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with File:PeterCriss.jpg[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:PeterCriss.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from image stolen from http://www.flickr.com/photos/toddowyoung/4186079543, stolen like all other uploads by uploader. As a copyright violation, File:PeterCriss.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:PeterCriss.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:PeterCriss.jpg and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:PeterCriss.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:PeterCriss.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Martin H. (talk) 19:18, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Peter criss.jpg[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Peter criss.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Peripitus (Talk) 20:53, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Images deleted[edit]

Tnarocks, I've just finished deleting the last of the images you uploaded. When you take images from websites you cannot upload them here claiming that they are self-made. While I could not find the source of one image (File:EricSinger09.jpg) I saw enough with the others to have little doubt. Please note that uploading images like this is copyright violation and is taken very seriously on Wikipedia, leading to blocking usually if editors continue - Peripitus (Talk) 21:02, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

February 2010[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for When you are given notes about copyright you need to take them seriously. Yet again you have ignored this and uploaded the same copyrighted image (of Paul Stanley) and claimed that it is yours. Copyright is taken very seriously on Wikipedia.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Peripitus (Talk) 03:34, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with File:ROH TV title.jpg[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:ROH TV title.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.facebook.com/search/?init=srp&sfxp=&q=ROH&o=65&c1=#!/photo.php?pid=3642338&id=71739451327. As a copyright violation, File:ROH TV title.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:ROH TV title.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:ROH TV title.jpg and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:ROH TV title.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:ROH TV title.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Mr. C.C.^{Hey yo!}_{I didn't do it!} 04:48, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Live 0807.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Live 0807.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 11:11, 15 March 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 11:11, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not learning ?[edit]

Tnarocks, see where I blocked you in february as you repeatedly ignored others copyright ? I've just deleted your last two uploads for the same reason. Please take this as a final warning....if you upload another image that you do not own, found on the internet, or otherwise ignore copyright, your account may be blocked for an extended period - Peripitus (Talk) 02:52, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Jeff Hardy TNA.jpg[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Jeff Hardy TNA.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --TJ Spyke 20:46, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Jeff_Hardy_TNA.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Jeff_Hardy_TNA.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 05:52, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Jeff Hardy TNA.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jeff Hardy TNA.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 23:49, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Atlantic Records has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Tiderolls 06:45, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You've been here long enough to know better than blank pages. Please stop. Tiderolls 06:47, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing, for a period of 24 hours, for vandalism/page blanking. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Tiderolls 06:54, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I truly do not understand this behavior. If you come back from your block and continue editing in this manner an indefinite block will be needed to prevent this type of disruption. Please consider how you can help here. Thanks Tiderolls 06:54, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Atlantic Records has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. — Jeff G. ツ 04:31, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Atlantic Records. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Bobby122 (talk) 05:01, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Atlantic Records. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Tiderolls 01:44, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Tiderolls 02:12, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]