User talk:Versus22/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

→

Archive 5

AfD nomination of Check Mii Out Channel

I have nominated Check Mii Out Channel, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Check Mii Out Channel. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Mayalld (talk) 23:49, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

Check Mii Out Channel: The girl with the bubbly personality

Why do you insist on adding this contest to the list of check mii out contests? I own a US wii, and it is not listed there. Does your wii list it? If so, something must be wrong with my wii. If not, stop adding it as it is not true. If you have a foreign wii, and it has that contest, add it with the repsective flag, not US and Canada. thanks. Smartyllama (talk) 13:40, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

So far, all the other Canada region contests are also in the U.S.A. I don't know what's happening here, do you have wiiconnect24 on? Versus22

Yes. I do. Do you have messaging new contests enabled? If so, did you receive a message? I did not, although I honestly haven't checked the channel itself in a while, I am just going by message.sSmartyllama (talk) 14:34, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Yes, I recieve messages from Nintendo whenever a new contest is available. Versus22

New images for the Wii Shop Channel

For this Wii Shop Channel article, we need new images (start up icon and/or the updated version of the Wii Shop Channel menu. I don't have a digital camera, and I only use my Wii most of the time... Versus22 (talk) 04:34, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

I'll see what I can do.  Doktor  Wilhelm  20:55, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

January 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Wii Menu. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. StephenBuxton (talk) 18:25, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

I saw your explanation on my talk page. Fair enough, moving the text to another location, that is a good reason for moving it. However, what I saw was a large amount of text being deleted with no explanation as to why. Whenever you make an edit, particularly if you are removing large amounts of text, please remember to fill in the edit summary. What I saw (and indeed User:Doktor Wilhelm and User:X201 saw, as I see they undid your edits too) when looking at the recent changes page (the link is on the left of the screen) was a large amount of text being removed with no reason given. This is a classic form of vandalism, recent patrollers (like myself) look for. We then revert, and drop a caution on the user's page. I'm not saying that you were vandalising and at the time I did not know if you were a vandal or an over-eager editor, which is why you received a reminder about the importance of edit summaries.

To save the hassle of going to people's talk pages and explaining to them individually why you did it, I would thoroughly recommend using the Edit Summary box. Had I seen an explanation, I would have ignored it (as would all the other recent patrollers), and your edit would have remained. As it is, it appears that your edit does need to be done again. If you have any questions, then feel free to drop a comment on my talk page. StephenBuxton (talk) 07:55, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

When you open up the edit window, just below where you edit the text, there is another box called the edit sumary. Just type a brief description in the box of what you are doing. For full details, see Help:Edit summary. If you have any further questions, please drop me aline on my talk page.StephenBuxton (talk) 12:48, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Just a helpful note

I've noticed you are formating a lot of the Wii related articles, an in doing so are pressing enter several times, to create space! try using <*br clear=all> (without the: *), I find that it helps with the formatting!  Doktor  Wilhelm  02:10, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the advice! I've only been on Wikipedia for a month now. I have a Nintendo Wii, thats why I'm doing some of these articles, or helping out... Versus22 (talk) 03:57, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

it's okay, I've been here a bit longer, but I don't know half of anything, I've noticed your work on the many Wii articles, and it's pretty good, sorry if I ever come across as sharp when I'm changing/editing/adding stuff, also I only learned the "br clear=all" of late, but I find it helps a lot with formatting aroung images (specially since I use my Wii for small amounts of Wikipedia editing/browsing), I really need to brush up on my html... Keep up the good work!  Doktor  Wilhelm  04:05, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Thats fine. Thanks for the credit! Versus22 (talk) 04:34, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Check Mii Out on GamerWiki

I've not created it yet - I was waiting to see if anyone else wanted to contribute to the discussion. I'll create it and move at some point during this week. I think this will mean that the Wikipedia article remains tightly focussed and in line with the Wikipedia idea, and we can easily link to the GamerWiki page. Tim (Xevious) (talk) 10:26, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Yes, I'm going to be adding all the other Wii channels on there over time, since they're individual games. The eventual idea of GamerWiki (and Encyclopedia Gamia) is to include all the information that WikiPedia deems to trivial to do with videogames ... Tim (Xevious) (talk) 00:28, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

GamerWiki

What's the link for it? I'll try to work on it when I can. RobJ1981 (talk) 04:54, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Powerball

All I know is, that IGN posted it. I've heard that Sega has a press site that only the "Press" can access. Not for public eyes. Also, I'm going to revert the games you deleted from the page. All those games have a source from the ESRB. Yes, I know that some of the titles are in "release limbo" but they do have a valid source. But besides that, you are doing a good job.  :) Neo Samus (talk) 15:20, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, but I think I remember seeing it on SEGA's site, now that I think about it. But I'm at work and don't have access to SEGA's site (filter's about 95% of all game related sites...bastards!!!) Neo Samus (talk) 15:37, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

No, I didn't read his whole post. Oops. Neo Samus (talk) 15:38, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Sega Press

I think it works the same way as Nintendo's but you really have to be a journalist or part of the press to access it. I have no idea what password to use. Neo Samus (talk) 17:32, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

IGN

Yes, what does IGN have to do with anything? --LN3000 (talk) 22:22, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

IGN backs up their news with provided sources, do they not? Are you going to ask me about every single possible site whether it's reliable or not? I think you're grasping at straws. --LN3000 (talk) 17:43, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Hey, please pardon my attitude at times. I mean no ill will toward anyone. I'm just a very stubborn person. :D Happy Easter to you, too. --LN3000 (talk)

Nintendo

Hey, I don't mind questions! :D Um... I don't pay much attention to the WikiProject. I poke my nose around once in awhile... It pretty much shows which articles need to be worked on. And seriously, I don't mind questions. I really hope you don't think I'll get frustrated at everything... I'm just frustrated after dealing with many problems regarding the List of Virtual Console games. I'm having enough to deal with that then worry about other articles! :D --LN3000 (talk) 03:28, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Nah, you're alright. --LN3000 (talk) 06:37, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Re: Regional Lists for Wii Games

I'm fine with switching to a regional format, as indeed the list is getting quite big. The only concern I have (and one of the primary reasons I advocated keeping the release dates in one list) is that with 3 or more separate lists to maintain, the majority of contributors will focus only on one (likely the North American release list), while the European and Japan releases will be ignored. The only other problem that I can think of is that there will no longer be a list containing every Wii game on the net, but that's rather minor.

But practicality is the most important, and seeing as how the sort function has already broken (this is not the first time either--we've already implemented a ton of workarounds), it's time to split up the lists. Go ahead and continue working on the NOrth American list; I'll work whenever I can either helping you finish the NA list or starting the Europe or Japan list. If anyone is opposed to the changes, a simple explanation of the circumstances should be enough to convince him or her. Digiwrld1 (talk) 22:16, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Yup, you're right all the VC lists are up to date, but that's due to the consistent release schedule that it enjoys: NA releases on Mondays, Europe on Fridays, and Japan I believe on Fridays as well. Since the releases are on an always consistent basis, the editors of the lists simply update the list after the games have been released--there's little or no confusion about street dates, ship dates, and so forth. But as I said, I'm completely behind the idea, and will be more than happy to help out whenever I can. Digiwrld1 (talk) 22:26, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Titles that have an 'Unreleased' next to them will not be seeing a release in that region, as far as we know. Titles that have a 'TBA' means that its likely to be released in that region, but a release date has yet to be announced. Thus, keep the titles that have TBA listed, but ignore the ones that have 'Unreleased'.

Are all the sort functions working for you in the List of Wii games? I just checked it out right now, and all seems to be functional. If that's the case, we should hold off on splitting the list, and take a vote of what other people think before making too drastic of a change -Digiwrld1 (talk) 00:32, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Your Page

I like what you did with page. You added a bit more detail than mine. When I have time I'd like to put my entire collection up. But it might take a while.....I have a lot of games to put down. Like in about the 100 range. It might be less I'm not sure, haven't counted in a while. Neo Samus (talk) 04:55, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

I hope my name reminds you of Samus from Metroid, that is who it is supposed to be.  ;) The Neo part comes from Neo from the Matrix. So I figured since Smaus is female adding Neo would make it a male version of Samus. Neo Samus (talk) 15:38, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of List of Wii games (North America)

An editor has nominated List of Wii games (North America), an article which you have created or worked on, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Wii games (North America) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 19:00, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

See my discussion on the deletion page. Versus22 (talk) 23:32, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Reply to comments on my talk page

I replied at the AFD page, but I wanted to say this here (as it has nothing to do with that article). The busy tag states: RobJ1981 (talk) is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. Being on Wikipedia every day doesn't mean anything. I'm not on as much as I was, and the tag is doing no harm. Settle down a little. RobJ1981 (talk) 05:35, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

See my 13:47 (UTC) reply on your talk page. Versus22 (talk) 13:48, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for assuming good faith. Just have a little more patience. I check my talk page whenever I'm on here, and reply on the same day usually. RobJ1981 (talk) 20:08, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Please close the AfD... Versus22 (talk) 23:14, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

SSBB

As far as I'm aware it should be ok, here's my code, 2578-2773-2490 name Neo....go figure. :P Neo Samus (talk) 14:05, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

...maybe I'll name myself Samus in the meantime. I've enter your # in. Versus22 (talk) 01:00, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

I haven't had a chance to add you yet. I've been house sitting and they don't have WiFi but I'll be able to on monday. Neo Samus (talk) 19:13, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

All right I finally got home! So I've added you now. Will you home on Tuesday? Neo Samus (talk) 02:42, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Crap I'll see if I can or not. I'm in IL (CDT). At 6pm I might not be able to play but I'll let you know. Neo Samus (talk) 16:00, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Hey. I meant to contact you earlier. I got cought up on doing homework. Sorry!! Neo Samus (talk) 01:08, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

Re: AfD Pre-Warning

Thanks for the warning. I didn't seperate the WiiWare article by the way. Oh. I accidently put this in your User page (I'm still kinda new here). Sorry about that. I deleted it.Mmark089 (talk) 06:52, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Okay, I just wanted to warn you just in case. Yeah don't worry, i'm new here too. Thank you for understanding! :). Versus22 (talk) 13:23, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

RFC discussion of User:RobJ1981

A request for comments has been filed concerning the conduct of RobJ1981 (talk · contribs). You are invited to comment on the discussion at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/RobJ1981. -- McJeff (talk) 06:15, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

I'll explain to you what to do when I get home from school. If I haven't by tomorrow remind me on m ytalk page again. And no, I'm not going to tell you how to vote (to forestall getting accused of it). McJeff (talk) 15:09, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

I didn't say how to vote, I said where. Vernon (Versus22) (talk) 23:29, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Sorry. Anyway I see you found it. McJeff (talk) 02:38, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

My busy tag shouldn't be such a big deal, so stop worrying about it. I explained it to you before, yet you have to bring it up on the RFC. It's one little tag, and it's doing no harm. It doesn't state I can't edit or shouldn't be editing. It just states I may not respond quickly. If I'm online, obviously I will reply to messages I see. RobJ1981 (talk) 06:32, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

It's not lying. The busy tag does NOT say I wont be online everyday. RobJ1981 (talk) 07:02, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

I'm not lying. The tag isn't solely for people that wont be on Wikipedia ever. Why can't you just drop it? It's not a big deal, stop hassling me about it. RobJ1981 (talk) 20:10, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

I checked my 500 most recent edits. There is numerous days where I didn't edit at all, or only did a few edits. March 2, March 6, March 13-16, March 21-23, April 2+3, April 9+10: very few edits. March 3, March 7-9, March 20, March 24-30, April 12: no edits by me. That more than justifies the busy tag. RobJ1981 (talk) 20:27, 15 April 2008 (UTC)