User talk:Webmantork
|
A tag has been placed on Browser Media, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}}
on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. ✤ JonHarder talk 21:47, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
Blocked
[edit]--Akhilleus (talk) 01:24, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
Webmantork (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I promise not to put any more client information on to Wikipedia, so I don't want to be associated with my former username.
Decline reason:
This was a clear case of sockpuppetry, for which you've been blocked. Using this name, you recreated the very articles that were created with your original account. Request declined. - auburnpilot talk 23:56, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I tried to recreate the named article using completely different language and trying to follow Wikipedia guidelines. I do admit that Browser Media is a client, so that is not permitted by Wikipedia. So I guess I answered my own objection.... Anyways, I could provide a list of clients whom I may not contribute information about, and never make a page that has to do with any of them or edit a page that has to do with any of them. Let me know.Webmantork 16:51, 14 June 2007 (UTC)