User talk:WoodyWerm/Archive1
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
A welcome from Sango123
Hello, WoodyWerm/Archive1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; I hope you like the place and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- If you haven't already, drop by the New user log and tell others a bit about yourself.
- Always sign your posts on talk pages! That way, others will know who left which comments.
- The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
- Simplified Ruleset
- How to edit a page
- Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Manual of Style
- Wikipedia Glossary
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Though we all make goofy mistakes, here is what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful.
Happy editing!
-- Sango123 (talk) 23:52, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
P.S. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you need help with anything or simply wish to say hello. :)
- You'll find everything you need at Wikipedia:Babel. Also note that this template allows you to create your own userboxes. As for talk page formatting, try a bit of HTML. Regards, Sango123 (talk) 01:00, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
Dont revert this page again, or I will revert every edit you ever make again in this account, I've done it before, and I can do it again.
-Note from WoodyWerm this message was by 72.49.52.246 talk Special:Contributions/72.49.52.246 who did not sign. Please use the --~~~~ to sign - --WoodyWerm 17:27, 31 December 2005 (UTC) -
- Let's don't make personal threats - please! This is not a personal dispute, it's a mere stylistic disagreement. See also WP:CIV. Cheers Jbetak 19:02, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
Whitchurch and Tattenhall Railway
As it isn't currently in use (or, from what I can see, completed!) I've moved the template you are developing for this rail route to your own userspace rather than it being in template / article space. When you've got it ready / complete feel free to move it back and link it from appropriate article(s). It is now at User:WoodyWerm/Scratchpad --AlisonW (talk) 15:48, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
Belated thanks
I was doing a bit of maintenance today and found your note of recognition. I did not want you to think I was ignoring you...of course you are welcome and I appreciate the positive feedback. See ya 'round Tiderolls 16:47, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
Rollback
I have granted you rollback rights. Looking at your editing history I can see you will not abuse this right, but be careful with it, especially if you use automated tools such as Huggle. Even with the best intentions it is very easy to make mistakes with such tools unless you are careful: spend the little time it takes to be sure you really are dealing with vandalism before acting. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:24, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
a thought
Hi ... I haven't gone back to double check this, but I think the vandal editor may well be within his rights to remove his warnings, but not his block ... Just a wikipedia rules peculiarity that you may be unaware of, so I thought I would share it with you. Best.--Epeefleche (talk) 18:12, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
- Page restored for continuity as the vandal blanked the page with profanity which was not restored before block notice was emposed. Any person reviewing the talk page would just see blocking notice and not know what it was for and would not be aware of the history. WoodyWerm (talk) 21:36, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
- I totally understand your reasoning, and have no particular sympathy for clear vandals. I just wanted to make sure that you didn't do something that might violate some arcane rule (that I may not agree with the rationale of), and open yourself to criticism by others. That's all. Best, and thanks for your help vandal-fighting. --Epeefleche (talk) 07:34, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
"Testing..." page renamed to "To be deleted"
Thank you!
Pandelver (talk) 12:56, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
On my own, I had determined as an option to otherwise rename the page to a useful, noteworthy topic name I am adding in relation to another extant article; having it gone is even better, so those other topics can have their own clear history.
You have a nice self-profile set of drop down menus, Woody(?), pleasure to (almost) meet a fellow hiker, and I would love to see Australia for the first time.
Warmest regards,
Pandelver (talk) 13:00, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Not signing your posts
Hey, when you leave messages on User talk pages or noticeboards, remember to sign them with four tildes. Like this: ~~~~. Thanks. --Jayron32 18:10, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
Membership of the Counter-Vandalism Unit
As you may know, the Counter-Vandalism unit is inactive. So for reviving the WikiProject, we will need to sort out the members. So if you are active, please put your username at the bottom of the list at Wikipedia talk:Counter-Vandalism Unit#Sort out the members.
You are receiving this message as a current member of the CVU.
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Counter-Vandalism Unit at 01:03, 30 October 2011 (UTC).
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, WoodyWerm. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, WoodyWerm. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, WoodyWerm. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)