Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kit evolution of the Peru national football team
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete per CSD:G7 as the author supports deletion and there are no other substantial contributors. Stifle (talk) 17:04, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Kit evolution of the Peru national football team (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Excessively detailed yet completely unsourced content fork. Already covered at Peru national football team#Team colours ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:07, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:10, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete but merge the information (and source it) into either the Team colours section linked by nom, or into History of the Peru national football team if that isn't deleted. — CHANDLER#10 — 10:13, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as original research. If anything in it is not OR (which I doubt), merge that much into one of the above-mentioned articles. Stifle (talk) 10:29, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I am the author of the page, and I found the source from which I got the information for that page. However, I used the source for the Peru national football team article, but did not include it in the "Kit evolution" article as I figured that it would be deleted (there was a merge proposal prior to this deletion). If you go to the "team colours" section of the Peru football team article, you'll see two sources for the same information provided (it's not original research). Nonetheless, I agree that deletion (at this point, with only two sources) is the best option.--[|!*//MarshalN20\\*!|] (talk) 12:09, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment The U.S. and Britain, two nations separated by a common language. I never knew the word kit was used this way; for us Yanks, the article is about the history of the uniforms of the Peruvian national soccer team. No opinion on keep or delete, but I am of the opinion that I learn something new every day. Mandsford (talk) 16:14, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.