Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Pyramid Peak Drainage

Pyramid Peak Drainage Waterfall[edit]

Reason: This image represents many hidden areas of a wilderness area many people believe to be devoid of such an oasis
Articles this image appears in: Desolation Wilderness
Creator: Phreakdigital, Mike Grindstaff
Nominator: Phreakdigital

Support — Phreakdigital 23:59, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
oppose — even if the image is above the 1k limit, I feel that the image is to little for this kind of object. _→AzaToth 00:17, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Beautiful. Just Beautiful. Ilikefood 00:57, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support That looks like it would make a great one of those animated pictures. --¿Why 1 9 9 1 ^{ESP. | Sign Here} 02:48, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Image is fuzzy, like it's dithered a little. Looks like at some point it had been saved with little color depth --⁪froth^{T C} 03:36, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The landscape looks.. artificial to me. It looks like it's a man made decoration or something (why would the rock on the sides look like that?). --antilived ^{T | C | G} 09:57, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. The colour in the image appears rather flat and dull for some reason, and I don't think the scenery depicted is particularly beautiful or anything, sorry. enochlau (talk) 15:08, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Moderate Support; while looking at the picture while it was loading, it has come to my attention that there seems to be less focus on scenery objects further away from the camera (such as the waterfall). However, the level of detail on scenery objects closer to the camera (such as the flowers) is virtually unmatched. -- Alt iris Exeunt 02:56, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support as said before beautiful, and per above. — Arjun 14:57, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Resolution isn't high enough. --Zantastik talk 01:24, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted --KFP (talk | contribs) 21:18, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]