Wikipedia:Featured and good topic removal candidates/James Bond films/archive1

James Bond films[edit]

I am nominating this topic for removal as it has passed its retention period for Spectre (2015 film), which has not achieved at least GA status more than three months after its release, so the topic is no longer complete, thus failing criteria 1(d). GamerPro64 16:00, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The article in question is currently at GAN. ツ FrB.TG (talk) 19:48, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Demote unless the Spectre article passes its GAN. Snuggums (talk / edits) 02:29, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Just wait, even if the review is taking a while to start. igordebraga ≠ 01:38, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove (regretfully) The topic is incomplete, and the GAN nomination for Spectre (2015 film) became stale a month ago. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 17:26, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Director comment - While there is consensus to demote this topic, the GAN is still going on, albeit stale. Once the nomination is done with, then we can decide the fate of the topic. GamerPro64 01:26, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delist – I know that the GAN is going on, but seeing the number of issues present, the GAN will hardly pass as noted by SchroCat in the review. Using sources like Twitter also does not help its case. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 14:20, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delist The GAN should have been shelved some time ago. The article should not have been nominated as it stood, and the nom has dragged on for too long. Until the article is given a thorough copyedit throughout, it should not pass, which will mean this drops of the edge too. - SchroCat (talk) 14:33, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
So with The GAN failing and the multiple Delist votes, this nomination will be closed with consensus to have the topic Delisted. - GamerPro64 20:10, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]