Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Chrome Division/1

Chrome Division[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • GAN review not found

Delisted per subpar referencing and research, in addition to being outdated, and no votes to "keep" after several weeks Snuggums (talk / edits) 23:38, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm nominating this article for reassessment because of several reasons:

the sourcing is poor: most of the references are primary sources (the band's own website), unreliable blogs (Live-Metal.net & Rock Something), or social media (myspace.com)
the article hasn't been updated in eight years (the last information is from 2007)
the musical style doesn't seem well researched

I know GAs back then weren't as demanding as today, but this page hardly seems like a good article to me.--Retrohead (talk) 21:19, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just to "formalise" this, I am the article's author and original nominator. I do not think that the piece was poor when promoted, but recognise that it is now significantly out of date. I do not have the time or inclination to update the article at this time, so do not object to it being delisted. Josh Milburn (talk) 15:54, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]