Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2009 March 4

< March 3	March 5 >

March 4

Template:Heroes Wiki

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 18:50, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Template:Heroes Wiki (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Created this template to help with cleanup of articles, but seems to be consensus that it should be deleted, since it is not warranted delete. Ejfetters (talk) 18:22, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

• Comment There has never been talk about deleting the template, just about placement on character articles. — Edokter • Talk • 21:01, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Wipeout team

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy deleted (CSD G8) by User:Horologium. –Black Falcon ^(Talk) 19:36, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Template:Wipeout team (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

AJUK ^Talk!! 17:26, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

• Delete – The article Wipeout teams was deleted per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wipeout teams, so there is no more use for this template. As a page that is wholly "dependent on a non-existent or deleted page", this could even qualify for speedy deletion under criterion G8 (it would be a somewhat liberal application of the criterion, but not unjustified). Tagging with {{dbfor review by 2nd admin. –Black Falcon ^(Talk) 07:25, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.