Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Pontiac's Rebellion/Archive 2
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Pontiac's Rebellion[edit]
Renomination by Wandalstouring. Kirill Lokshin 02:02, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support as before. Carom 02:10, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Conditional Support - needs a few more refs in places. Buckshot06 03:02, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose Until its cited sufficiently. Many paragraphs are noticeably bare.
- Seems to be very well written though, and deserves to be A class at least. Raymond Palmer 03:13, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose. Very well written, just needs more inline citations. Cla68 07:28, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. Lengthy, one of the most detailed, well-written, and nicely formatted (i.e. looks nice on the page, lots of quotes, pictures, maps, which are well-placed, well-labeled, not overwheleming, etc) articles I've seen in some time. LordAmeth 13:20, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Great article, but needs more cits. Kyriakos 01:03, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Support as it is. The refs are a slight problem, but not big enough to incite rejection in this case. And on another note, per Raymond, the prose is fantastic. Kirill, don't be afraid to exercise some dictatorial authority in ignoring the opposing votes (kidding).UberCryxic 02:41, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support (I want to point out that my nomination was only a formal issue because this article had failed for lack of assessments.) The citation can be improved as a lot of sources are used. Probably someone started this from a not too well referenced article. Wandalstouring 02:32, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.