Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Roads/Assessment/A-Class review/New York State Route 73
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Result was promote to A-class. Imzadi1979 (talk) 00:34, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
New York State Route 73 (4 net support votes)
[edit]New York State Route 73 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) review
- Suggestion: Promote to A-Class
- Nominator's comments: Since I am an apparent horrible article writer, I'm taking the article here before FAC.
- Nominated by: Mitch32(UP) 23:41, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - Nicely done. ~~ ĈĠ ☺ Simple? 00:05, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - issues resolved. --Rschen7754 (T C) 23:10, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
finding a whole bunch of errors in the lead.
- It heads through some of the mountains in the Adirondack Region, crossing bases of some of the tallest mountains in the state, including Porter and Lower Wolfjaw Mountains - crossing the bases, wikilink the ranges
- Done.Mitch32(UP) 02:07, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Lead par 2 - rephrase=a bit of repetition (sentence 1-3)
- Done.Mitch32(UP) 02:07, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- ever-growing?
- Done.Mitch32(UP) 02:07, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Route vs. State Route - shouldn't SR be used?
- Not done.Mitch32(UP) 02:07, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- par. 3 - "route north of that" - find another way to say that. It could be another route paralleling...
- Did you really mean paralleling to the north? --Rschen7754 (T C) 18:19, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes.Mitch32(UP) 02:07, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Did you really mean paralleling to the north? --Rschen7754 (T C) 18:19, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- 3rd sentence a bit choppy - combine with another sentence. --Rschen7754 (T C) 06:10, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Done.Mitch32(UP) 10:56, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- 1 - first paragraph, - 3rd and 4th sentences could be combined.
- DoneMitch32(UP) 12:20, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Route 73 begins to descend in elevation, while County Route 51 splits off and merges in. - I don't understand. May want to merge with next sentence as well.
- DoneMitch32(UP) 12:20, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- End of that paragraph - it, not its.
- DoneMitch32(UP) 12:20, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- last paragraph - first two sentences could be combined. --Rschen7754 (T C) 18:31, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- DoneMitch32(UP) 12:20, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- It heads through some of the mountains in the Adirondack Region, crossing bases of some of the tallest mountains in the state, including Porter and Lower Wolfjaw Mountains - crossing the bases, wikilink the ranges
I'll be in queens today, so any more replies will be slow.Mitch32(UP) 12:20, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- 2- However, exporting the items made by these industries were hard as there was a lack of transportation in the area. - verb should be singular
- popping up all over the area - too colloquial
- 4th and 5th sentences could be combined of 2nd paragraph 2.1. --Rschen7754 (T C) 18:49, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments:
- "The route quickly turns to the southeast." - you may want to rephrase this sentence, as I'm not sure "quickly" describes it well.
- Done.Mitch32(UP) 02:07, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- "Route 73 now longs along the East Branch, intersecting with county and local roads as its heads southward." - I don't quite understand the first part of this sentence. - Algorerhythms (talk) 04:43, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Done.Mitch32(UP) 10:56, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- "The route quickly turns to the southeast." - you may want to rephrase this sentence, as I'm not sure "quickly" describes it well.
Support - Algorerhythms (talk) 21:51, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comments Got some grammar errors:
- "with U.S. Route 9 1 mile (1.6 km) of Underwood." is missing a word, maybe NORTH of Underwood?
- Done.Mitch32(UP) 02:07, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- West Branch of the Ausable River, is this the proper name? In the western US it's rare to see "of the" in there, just checking.
- That is the proper name.
- However, this is not accessible via NY 73 except from the intersection with CR 35. This sounds rough.
- Done.Mitch32(UP) 02:07, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The abbreviation NY 73 is never explained
- Done.Mitch32(UP) 02:07, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The abbreviation CR is explained on the second instance, not the first.
- Not Done.Mitch32(UP) 02:07, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- "The area had been big with the lumber and iron industries." The use of "big" is a non-standard use of the word. Try to avoid that, for non-native speakers.
- Done.Mitch32(UP) 02:07, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- "However, exporting the stuff made" Surely there is a better word to use on a FA candidate than "stuff".
- Done.Mitch32(UP) 02:07, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- See Also -- this section is used to link articles not already linked in prose. Keene, New York is already linked multiple times.
- Done.Mitch32(UP) 02:07, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- There is an unacceptable level of WP:Overlink violations. Overlap, Lake Champlain, Keene etc. etc. are all linked multiple times in the same paragraph.
Dave (talk) 01:57, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- All Done.Mitch32(UP) 02:07, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- "The area had been powerful with the lumber and iron industries." The word powerful doesn't quite fit, try to re-word this sentence. Pending this change, I support promotion.Dave (talk) 04:27, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Done - :) Mitch32(UP) 10:31, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support then. Dave (talk) 23:07, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.