User talk:Coaches 101

May 2024[edit]

Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because it has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Also, your username gives the impression that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

If you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization, you may request unblock and a username change. In your reasons, you must:

Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement; and
Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked; and
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked; and
Provide a new username.

To do this, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked.

Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken and in use by another account. You can search to see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is still available.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. 331dot (talk) 08:41, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How can this account be block when the article was placed in Sandbox, and the article of topic was gaining advise, plus following the rules Help:Referencing for beginners, that was referenced as advise from User talk:Qwerfjkl - Wikipedia. Coaches 101 (talk) 09:45, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I blocked this account as the result of a report at WP:UAA for an inappropriate username, as well as an examination of the subject matter of your edits. Please follow the instructions above. 331dot (talk) 09:47, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This account was following the rules, asking questions to editors on the rules, your opinion is premature, and this account has not violated anything including username. Coaches 101 (talk) 09:54, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Coaches 101 Your username and edits imply that you have a connection with Coaches 101 Production, which would also mean you have a Conflict of interest. If you also work at/for Coaches 101 Production you have done undisclosed paid editing, which also needs to be clarified. You need need to at least do the following to have a chance at being unblocked:

Explain your connection to Coaches 101 Production
Show that you understand the Conflict of interest policy including paid editing and why/how it affects you

Nobody (talk) 13:40, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Coaches 101 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

smokeploy1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

Change of username to comply with user name status.

Decline reason:

Your username is only one small part of the problem here. Yamla (talk) 12:46, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Look, we are not going to be treated with disrespect and discrimination on a dying encyclopedia. We joined in good faith, follow the rules in good faith, asked questions in good faith--if this dying non chronicle source of opinionated information, has a problem with our signing up. We will refuse to participate in this lackluster organization. Coaches 101 (talk) 08:57, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for revealing that you are indeed part of an organization. No one here is treating you with disrespect. This website is consistently one of the top visited websites in the world, far from "dying". It's only those dissatisfied with the community that say it is "dying". All we are asking you to do is to be honest with us and comply with relevant policies, or at least explain why they don't apply to you. If you don't wish to do that, that's your decision. 331dot (talk) 09:03, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]