User talk:Arigato1

Inappropriate edit summary

[1] is inappropriate (translated: "Valentinian tries to provoke me with a new user in an attempt to smear you on your page. I can't tell if your're a Jew or gay. Get a life wanker.". You have been warned about this before. Blocked for 48 hours. ++Lar: t/c 04:08, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Trelleborg1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Trelleborg1.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:10, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Trelleborg2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Trelleborg2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:13, 1 April 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Valentinian ^{T / C} 20:13, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jews and gays

I must say I gather from the above you have made comments on the Jews and the gays as especially malfactory to the national wellbeing. I will not judge you, as I can see where you might be comeing from, and the interest in Cnut lets me think you are a person with honour and loyalty in your heart. All the same, if you want to think our troubles are all down to these people, who, as a whole, are scapegoats, understand this...Jews may be international money launderers, gays may wish to be blind to the pains of mankind, yet really, capitalism itself is international deceit, which drowns in people blind to the degradations which plague their existence. If it is capitalism of complete arse holes, content to shit all over their own people, it is especially the case. It don't matter if Hitler was a unifier of nations, and commander of armies, he was a shit head... and the Nazi followers were, and are, mugs. Cnut was no fascist, the only shame on him is that people like that use such heroes as loudspeakers which magicly turn their lies into beautiful and romantic truths... I hope you understand, and the necessity to say this to you unecessary anyway. I just wish people wise up... smell the crispy bacon. I am British by the way and proud of my nation, and prouder still to know we stood against the black tide of ignorance. Even if it was not a unanimous vote. I bet many Germans were happy the British did this too. Alot of their liberal economics comes from the British who put Germany back together. A shame we could not do the same for ourselves.

I see you are a fan of the Japanese, if not one yourself. Maybe you know that one of the foremost Samurai philosophies is that a Samurai does not deal in the ways of politicians, as there is no glory in their deeds. That says alot to me. Just look at the world today... politics in its present form is the only real blight we face on the Earth.

WikieWikieWikie 10:24, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Canute the Great

Now for Cnut! It is a good question... I am glad you ask. I will not pretend to know anything exact, although I will tell you what I imagine is likely to be a true answer. Cnut's conquest of England meant that he was the rightful leader of the English army, and the fleet, in battle. He was of course king of the Danes also, although I believe the Danish army went home with Harald his brother after the conquest (I will get to the 1016 thing. It is probably wrong. If Harald died after he left England, it was in 1017, 1018 is the most likely anyway, for various reasons which I must check on). This means that Cnut found a way to keep his hold on the country, without a particularly significant Danish military presence. After all, he was not the King of Denmark at the time of his coronation as King of Engand.

It was the Huscarls who meant he could do this. His own essentially private, army, which he was the founder of. These were the House-men, probably of considerably mixed nationality. His mixing of English and Danish Earls is testament to this. Anyway, the Danelaw meant half the country was loyal to him anyway, and the English in persistent opposition dealt with over the couple of years after his enthronment, most were already dead.

So, with the Huscarls in consideration, Cnut's army was mainly English, in England, along with Danes in Denmark, and the glue which held it all together were the king's own elite troops, on the royal payroll. After his death, these men went to his sons, although as the succession was in dispute, they probably divided, although maybe not along the lines of nationality.

England was then, basically the same after Cnut died, with most Danes and English in support of his sons as the best options presented themselves. With basic unsureity, as well as much conflicts of propagandas by the magnates, who were behind one or the other of the women who bore the childer. It gets complicated here though.

So I'll just leave it at the fact that in 1066, Harald II Godwineson, died on the grasses of Hastings with his Huscarls there to die with him, and the last remant of Cnut's stamp on the English military. The Normans kept many of his laws, as well as his four Earldoms, although theirs was an entirely different way of life than that of the Vikings.

WikieWikieWikie 10:25, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your removal of information with a phony argument

Concerning this and this removal of information, I do not think that you actually *lie* but you should probably just read the cited text again. To avoid any misunderstandings about you erroneous reason for removing the text, I cite the source here:

In fact the [...] data indicate Germans and a few other Central European populations as being the closest to the Norwegians. When we compare our results with those based on different polymorphic systems,9,17 we can infer that these conclusions are also valid for Swedish, while Finns and Saami had a quite different genetic history with a great impact of Uralic Finno-Ugric speaking population.[2]

As you can see, the reason you cited for removing the text is disturbingly wrong.--The trollfighter 12:33, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your confusion of two kings by the same name

Here you appear to have confused Guthrum the Old, 9th c. ruler of the Danelaw, with Gorm the Old, 10th c. king of Denmark. I have reverted your mistake, and I am checking your latest contributions to verify that there are no other similar obvious mistakes among your contributions.--The trollfighter 12:54, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with copyright

You have added two pictures, which I have removed since they have dubious copyright status. One of them even has a copyright notice on them!--The trollfighter 13:01, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your unexplainable creation of a redundant disambiguation page

I see that you moved Trelleborg to Trelleborg Municipality and made the old name into a disambiguation article into which you copied and pasted the content of Trelleborg (disambiguation). The result is a double disambiguation page. Would you care to explain how you reasoned?--The trollfighter 16:14, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your interesting iniative has been reported to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents and I hope that more experienced users will know how to deal with the situation.--The trollfighter 16:37, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

April 2007

Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Image:Trelleborg1.jpg. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Your original contributions are welcome.
⇒ SWATJester ^{On Belay!} 19:04, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Image:Trelleborg2.jpg. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Your original contributions are welcome.
⇒ SWATJester ^{On Belay!} 19:06, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring on Four Great Inventions of ancient China - in view of past transgressions, blocked for a week

Arigato1: You have been warned, repeatedly, about removing material that you assert has some POV without discussion on the talk page first. Your edits to Four Great Inventions of ancient China, in which you modified two of the listed inventions, even though they are discussed further below as being disputed by other scholars, from an article about the historical identification of these 4 inventions as chinese which does not assert that they actually are, but rather discusses how scholars made the identification, were inappropriate to begin with, and could even be viewed as a kind of vandalism. Reverting back to your changes after being warned, without discussion on the talk page, is unacceptable edit warring, even if it does not technically violate WP:3RR.

In view of the many times you have been warned about this sort of edit behaviour (as your talk page history clearly shows), you have been blocked for a week. Please use the time to contemplate your actions. Your current edit patterns are unacceptable and I would need some indication that you understand the issue and plan to change your ways before I would even consider shortening this block. (Note that using a sock to vandalise my page, or blanking your own talk page with an edit summary, in danish, that I am a fool, both things you have done in the past, are not ways to convince anyone that you get how things are here yet). I would encourage any other admin to contact me first before modifying this block. ++Lar: t/c 13:03, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Use of a sock (user:Klovn) to evade block

For use of a sock Klovn (talk • contribs • count • logs • page moves • block log • email), as confirmed by a CU, to evade your block, and in view of your past transgressions and sockpuppetry, your block is increased to two weeks. Please use the time to consider how to be a constructive editor here. ++Lar: t/c 03:23, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding bogus information or original research

Please reconsider your attitude to Wikipedia. This is not the medium for original research or experimentation with bogus information. I sincerely hope that after your 2 week block, you will contribute in a constructive manner so others will not have to clean up after each and every edit you have made.--Holger the Dane 10:01, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A request for Checkuser has been filed against you.

You are hereby informed that I have filed a request for checkuser against you due to your disruptive edits and the recent appearance of various importer accounts trying to smear me. Valentinian ^{T / C} 20:46, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The result of this can be seen at: Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Arigato1.

Indefinitely blocked

For creating a slew of new socks, and reverting to previous behaviour, with no sign that you understand and accept the processes we use here, you have been blocked indefinitely. You may appeal this by placing {{unblock}} with a justification, on your user page. ++Lar: t/c 18:23, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]