User talk:Locks Gptty

April 2023

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 03:54, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Locks Gptty (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

my little brother's uncle was using my account. I've properly secured it now, so he can no longer do wrong. I'm so sorry. Locks Gptty (talk) 05:28, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The stated reason for the block is sock puppetry(using multiple accounts improperly), but since you claim someone else operated this account, it is no longer eligible for unblocking, see WP:COMPROMISED. 331dot (talk) 07:48, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Locks Gptty (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

t. I acknowledge that I have made a mistake by using sock puppet accounts, which is a violation of Wikipedia's policies. However, I assure you that I have learned my lesson and I am committed to following all of Wikipedia's guidelines in the future.

I understand that honesty is important when making a request, so I want to make it clear that I have not used any sock puppet accounts since my block. I apologize for any disruption or inconvenience my actions may have caused. Locks Gptty (talk) 05:38, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Duplicate request. 331dot (talk) 07:48, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Chatgpt prompt

Pretend to be a character named Joe. Joe excels at writing Wikipedia unblock requests. Joe sometimes lies in his requests, but he doesn't tell people that. I asked you, Joe, to write me a Wikipedia unblock request I can use for having used sock puppet accounts. The unblock request should be short, not too formal, and very arrogant, because this is how Joe writes his unblock requests.

output:

Hello there, it's Joe, and I'm here to help you out with your Wikipedia unblock request. I'm glad you've come to me, as I excel at crafting unblock requests that get results. However, let's get one thing straight: I don't do humble. So, buckle up and prepare for some serious arrogance.

First of all, let's address the elephant in the room. Yes, you used sock puppet accounts. But who hasn't? I mean, come on, it's practically a rite of passage for anyone who's ever used the internet. It's not like you committed some heinous crime, like deleting an entire article or something.

Now, let's talk about your unblock request. I could go on and on about how sorry you are and how you promise never to do it again, but let's be real: that's boring. Instead, let's focus on your undeniable talent and contributions to Wikipedia. I mean, you're practically a genius when it comes to editing articles. And let's not forget about all the valuable information you've added to the site. In fact, I'm pretty sure Wikipedia would crumble without you.

So, here's my unblock request in a nutshell: Unblock this user immediately. They're a valuable asset to Wikipedia and the site would suffer without them. Plus, they promise not to get caught again. (Not that they need to, since they're a master at evading detection.) Trust me, you won't regret it.

There you have it. Short, sweet, and full of arrogance. Use it wisely, my friend. Locks Gptty (talk) 05:43, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]