User talk:Starwars1791...continued

If i have made a questionable edit, please notify me here

Lennon's #9 Dream

Hello,

I noticed you reverted my edits to this page... just made the page a little more correct, added some 9 facts and took out extraneous info. it's a legit edit, not vandalism. Hotcop2 (talk) 00:21, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I appologize,my error.

February 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Revolver. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --CliffC (talk) 00:50, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You also reverted The Skies are Weeping with no indication why. Your revert removed a substantial amount of work that was well-supported/documented. I've restored the work, but ask that you please cease from reverting Wikipedia articles until you understand what you're doing, and talk with other editors on the article's talk page. We're slowly but steadily improving this article; we hope to continue without the disruption of unnecessary reverts. Thanks. --Yksin (talk) 01:23, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry as you see i use the anti-vandal tool, but I still should not have reverted that.

I used Twinkle myself.

Fighting vandalism is laudable, but you still need to be sure you know what's vandalism & what's not, or you can be mistaken for a vandal yourself. As of yesterday when I looked, you had only about 50 edits to your credit -- of those, three were the erroneous reverts that I & CliffC & Hotcop2 have complained about here. That starts looking pretty slapdash. On the other hand, some of the other edits you did yesterday reverted genuine vandalism -- so I judged that you were probably genuine in your desire to fight vandalism. I just ask that you take more care in discerning between vandalism & legitimate article improvement. You might want to take a look at WP:VAN. --Yksin (talk) 02:10, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I did and I understand.

Speedy deletion of User:افشن

Please do not make personal attacks. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:User:افشن|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. I-210 (talk) 03:38, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, such as User:افشن, you will be blocked from editing. I-210 (talk) 03:39, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

He started it http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Starwars1791...continued&oldid=270335374 I should not have tried revenge though.

your recent changes to User talk:Spencer

Please explain these changes you made to this user's page. What you did constitutes vandalism and I have absolutely no tolerance for vandalism in user or user talk space. I'll watchlist this page so you may reply here or on my talk page. An vandalism after this message is timestamped and I'll block this account for a good while. Protonk (talk) 01:05, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. I won't do it again. Also as you can see that apart from the ocasional hate speech and revert errors I am a good Wikipedian who tries to stop Vandalism.

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Starwars1791...continued for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Wuhwuzdat (talk) 03:46, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below. Protonk (talk) 03:49, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]