User talk:Wikicircuit

October 2017

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Meena (actress), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. General Ization ^Talk 20:31, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Actually her mother was born in Chirakkal Palace-Kerala. Meena was born and in Chennai Tamil Nadu. Don't simply remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Meena (actress), without giving a valid reason. She clearly mention in that video that her mother was from kannur. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikicircuit (talk • contribs) 19:25, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, unless you cite a reliable source in making such a change, you are the vandal.. Saying that something is "clearly mentioned" in some (unspecified) video isn't a citation of a reliable source. See our policies concerning Biography of living persons and WP:BURDEN. General Ization ^Talk 20:33, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Annaatthe, you may be blocked from editing. BOVINEBOY2008 15:12, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 16:00, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 16:01, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting sourced material

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 01:26, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Seetharamayya Gari Manavaralu, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not remove sources and use the talk page for discussion Ab207 (talk) 19:52, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Meena (actress). 2402:3A80:1C40:B45F:D93E:C05B:C306:571 (talk) 19:19, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

Hello, Wikicircuit, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as 218.111.17.195 (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. 2402:3A80:1C40:B45F:D93E:C05B:C306:571 (talk) 19:32, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Meena (actress), you may be blocked from editing. 2402:3A80:1C40:B45F:D93E:C05B:C306:571 (talk) 20:20, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Meena (actress). This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. 2402:3A80:1C40:B45F:D93E:C05B:C306:571 (talk) 19:41, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you continue to log out to edit war, you will be blocked from editing.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:23, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours (see below) for edit warring. ~~Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.~~

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:32, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Important notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:34, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Sock puppetry/illegitimate logged-out editing with a legal threat (Special:Diff/1041589742) and severe edit warring after multiple warnings about the same behavior.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:38, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]