Nick McKenzie: Revision history

Filter revisionsshowhide

To date:

Tag filter:

Invert selection

External tools:

For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

curprev 12:1312:13, 15 January 2024 Mkstokes talk contribs 40,792 bytes +1,736 Undid revision 1195813590 by TarnishedPath (talk) Reinstated section supported by reliable source. To blatantly do this and constantly remove this text is WP:DISRUPTIVE. The source clearly states "... the episode and its accompanying news articles, compiled by journalists Nick McKenzie...". Previous editor has continuously misquoted the article. Furthermore, consensus says to keep this section in. Also added Vice Media artic
curprev 11:1811:18, 15 January 2024 TarnishedPath talk contribs 39,056 bytes −1,745 RfCs at WP:RS/N have not determined Vice Media to be unreliable. Until such time as that occurs we are free to use it as a reference. Remove section that is not supported by the sources. The Australian citation does not state that McKenzie compiled the 60 Minutes episode. To state use it a manner to suggest that it does is WP:OR and a WP:BLP violation. The source states "... accompanying news articles, compiled by journalists Nick McKenzie ...". Only mention of newspaper.

curprev 17:5317:53, 14 January 2024 GünniX talk contribs m 40,801 bytes −1 ref name Tag: AWB
curprev 06:4506:45, 14 January 2024 TarnishedPath talk contribs m 40,802 bytes 0 Correct spelling. Australian English uses -ise suffix not ize suffix. Per the template at the top of this page and the notice on the talk page this article uses Australian English.
curprev 00:4100:41, 14 January 2024 TechGeek105 talk contribs m 40,802 bytes +51 added the date and access date to the Crikey ref about him having 14 Walkley Awards and him reporting on Four Corners. Tag: Visual edit

curprev 15:2615:26, 10 January 2024 Mkstokes talk contribs 39,227 bytes +270 Undid revision 1194705878 by TarnishedPath (talk) Previous edit is false as The Australian article clearly says "Mr Schiff alleged the episode and its accompanying news articles, compiled by journalists Nick McKenzie..." so the citation does reference the 60 Minutes episode which were found to be defamatory. Thus there is no WP:BLP case for removal. Tags: Undo Reverted
curprev 09:3009:30, 10 January 2024 TarnishedPath talk contribs 38,957 bytes −270 Restored revision 1194089272 by AnomieBOT (talk): The only context in which McKenzie's name is mentioned in The Australian article is in relation to newspaper articles which were found to be not defamtory. Removed per WP:BLP. Better source still needed as the NYT citation does not mention McKenzie. Tags: Twinkle Undo Reverted

curprev 23:2423:24, 24 December 2023 Markj573 talk contribs 38,546 bytes +344 Having secondary source Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit

curprev 14:0014:00, 23 December 2023 Davide King talk contribs m 38,202 bytes −1 ce Tag: Reverted
curprev 11:4711:47, 23 December 2023 Sentaso talk contribs 38,203 bytes −587 Schiff won the judgement per Australian court documents, the only thing that was settled was the amount of damages. Describing the court case as being 'settled' is misleading Tag: Reverted
curprev 11:0911:09, 23 December 2023 Sentaso talk contribs 38,790 bytes +230 →Court cases and shield laws: the video is verifiably between both parties in question, WP:RSPYT does not ban YouTube videos explicitly. Further, the video does not act as a source of opinion, merely an unedited factual record as to what happened Tag: Reverted
curprev 10:5610:56, 23 December 2023 Sentaso talk contribs 38,560 bytes 0 move to correct location - Court Cases Tag: Reverted