Satanic Verses: Revision history

Filter revisionsshowhide

To date:

Tag filter:

Invert selection

External tools:

For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

curprev 16:3316:33, 5 September 2024‎ 82.8.223.217 talk‎ 48,325 bytes −165‎ →‎Basic narrative: There was misleading evidence in the previous text, which held the view that Satan tried to tempt Prophet Muhammad (Peace & Salutations Be Upon Him) into uttering a number of extra words. However, Surah An-Najm verse 20 in the Qur'an does not show this extra text there. This proves that the claim of Satanic Verses is void. undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

curprev 00:0500:05, 28 June 2024‎ Keith D talk contribs‎ 48,486 bytes −58‎ Fix cite date error undo Tag: AWB

curprev 09:1209:12, 1 June 2024‎ Sigma440 talk contribs‎ m 48,100 bytes −96‎ Undid revision 1226698061 by 67.149.145.240 (talk) rvv undo Tag: Undo
curprev 08:1808:18, 1 June 2024‎ 67.149.145.240 talk‎ 48,196 bytes +96‎ one of the many lies on this page undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit

curprev 21:2221:22, 27 April 2024‎ Sohanjs111 talk contribs‎ 47,617 bytes −483‎ No edit summary undo Tag: Reverted

curprev 18:3218:32, 25 April 2024‎ VenusFeuerFalle talk contribs‎ 48,100 bytes −112‎ Restored revision 1220045102 by VenusFeuerFalle (talk): Actually it does not need a citation since the lead is a sumamry of the body of the text, the and text makes this clear. However, a citation might be needed for disputed claims. Therefore, feel free to add the citation from the text in order to improve the article. undo Tags: Twinkle Undo

curprev 21:4121:41, 24 April 2024‎ Alienx talk contribs‎ 48,212 bytes +101‎ No edit summary undo Tags: Reverted nowiki added Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
curprev 21:3921:39, 24 April 2024‎ Alienx talk contribs‎ 48,111 bytes −28‎ No edit summary undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
curprev 21:3721:37, 24 April 2024‎ Alienx talk contribs‎ 48,139 bytes +2‎ No edit summary undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
curprev 21:3521:35, 24 April 2024‎ Alienx talk contribs‎ m 48,137 bytes +37‎ Needed references to backup this statement undo Tags: Reverted nowiki added Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit

curprev 21:3121:31, 20 April 2024‎ VenusFeuerFalle talk contribs‎ 48,141 bytes −428‎ Undid revision 1219928777 by 96.234.163.182 (talk) religious scholars do not fall into historians but theologians and do not meet the neutral viewpoint criteria (apart from being unlikely that a scholar almost 1000 years later can trace back an oral account more reliable than those who did 200 years later). revert as per WP:RNPOV undo Tags: Undo Reverted
curprev 19:0119:01, 20 April 2024‎ 96.234.163.182 talk‎ 48,569 bytes +428‎ Gave nuance in the introductory section, citing well-renowned Islamic Scholars who've proved weak lines of transmission or fabrication undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit
curprev 14:2114:21, 20 April 2024‎ VenusFeuerFalle talk contribs‎ 48,141 bytes 0‎ wiki link at the first mentioning undo

curprev 19:1819:18, 15 April 2024‎ Bhugh talk contribs‎ 48,142 bytes −2‎ grammar improvement: categorically reject => categorically deny undo
curprev 19:1519:15, 15 April 2024‎ Bhugh talk contribs‎ 48,144 bytes +6‎ grammar fixes to sentence in intro: "According to some Islamic tradition, God sent Satan as a tempter to test the audience. Others straightfully reject this incident ever happened." undo

curprev 19:4819:48, 7 April 2024‎ VenusFeuerFalle talk contribs‎ 48,138 bytes +144‎ the conceot should be introduced first, then going into detail, not summarizing the issue and then going into the name. undo
curprev 19:4119:41, 7 April 2024‎ VenusFeuerFalle talk contribs‎ 47,994 bytes −4‎ move to history section since it is more concerned about the history rather than the Muslim reception. undo
curprev 19:3719:37, 7 April 2024‎ VenusFeuerFalle talk contribs‎ 47,998 bytes +419‎ →‎Reception in Muslim exegesis undo

curprev 19:3119:31, 29 March 2024‎ Kaalakaa talk contribs‎ 47,626 bytes −567‎ Reverted 1 edit by 24.90.238.3 (talk): Sorry, but Answering-Islam.org is not a reliable source to use on Wikipedia, except perhaps for an article about itself. Please see WP:SOURCE. For historical topics like this, academic writings are preferred, such as those published by university presses or academic publishers like De Gruyter. Also, please avoid original research, see WP:OR. undo Tags: Twinkle Undo
curprev 04:5204:52, 29 March 2024‎ 24.90.238.3 talk‎ 48,193 bytes +567‎ No edit summary undo Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit

curprev 00:1600:16, 15 March 2024‎ Kaalakaa talk contribs‎ 47,626 bytes −453‎ No page or loc is provided undo
curprev 00:1500:15, 15 March 2024‎ Kaalakaa talk contribs‎ 48,079 bytes −1,381‎ Apologias from religious sources; fail WP:SOURCE policy, which requires sources to be independent. undo

curprev 16:0716:07, 6 March 2024‎ Endersslay talk contribs‎ 49,460 bytes −398‎ Reverting edit(s) by RoyalScooby (talk) to rev. 1211934926 by JMF: non-constructive (RW 16.1) undo Tags: RW Undo
curprev 16:0716:07, 6 March 2024‎ RoyalScooby talk contribs‎ 49,858 bytes −2‎ No edit summary undo Tag: Reverted
curprev 16:0616:06, 6 March 2024‎ RoyalScooby talk contribs‎ 49,860 bytes +400‎ No edit summary undo Tag: Reverted