Jump to content

Sea Tigers: Revision history


For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

24 July 2024

12 May 2024

20 April 2024

6 April 2024

11 January 2024

29 December 2023

21 November 2023

13 November 2023

8 November 2023

6 November 2023

2 November 2023

1 November 2023

22 October 2023

8 August 2023

5 August 2023

27 June 2023

25 June 2023

20 June 2023

19 June 2023

11 June 2023

31 May 2023

  • curprev 02:0702:07, 31 May 2023Okiloma talk contribs 36,889 bytes +607 The naval wing of the Tigers' have fought so many naval battles against our navy in the SL waters. Some battles even went for days. e.g.: When they tried hard to defend 'Operation Thirividapahara' but we landed finally. lol. But they can never be stated as 'Navy' 'cause it only applies to the state's, not to Non State actors like Tigers. Also they cannot be classified because they have not attacked any interna. ships. They only hijacked Sri Lankan naval supply ships to Jaffna. specific history! undo
  • curprev 01:5001:50, 31 May 2023Okiloma talk contribs 36,282 bytes +1 No edit summary undo
  • curprev 01:4901:49, 31 May 2023Okiloma talk contribs 36,281 bytes +22 A naval wing is used for naval combat and more than 100s of naval battle were fought between our navy and Sea Tigers. History should not be changed undo

30 May 2023

28 May 2023

  • curprev 15:0615:06, 28 May 2023Cossde talk contribs 36,232 bytes +117 No edit summary undo
  • curprev 15:0215:02, 28 May 2023Cossde talk contribs 36,115 bytes −415 Undid revision 1157426540 by Oz346 (talk) ref presented in not a RS since its not freely available for verification. If the ref states "non-state navy" then its a Violent non-state actors at sea. undo Tag: Undo
  • curprev 14:4014:40, 28 May 2023Oz346 talk contribs 36,530 bytes +415 This source describes it as a navy, even if it calls it a non state navy. However, other RS describe it as a de facto state. So there is disagreement in the RSs whether the LTTE was a state or non state actor. Irrespective of this it is agreed by even the non-state calling source, that the sea tigers were a navy. undo Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • curprev 14:0014:00, 28 May 2023Cossde talk contribs 36,115 bytes +16 Using violent non-state actors at sea due to the lack of RS to prove other wise undo
  • curprev 13:5113:51, 28 May 2023Oz346 talk contribs 36,099 bytes −4 UN or other states are not the gods of wikipedia. Wikipedia is based on reliable sources, not on what the UN recognises. Reliable sources describe LTTE as running a de facto state: https://www.jstor.org/stable/4017738 http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/7508829.stm undo
(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)