Talk:Real robot: Revision history

28 March 2022

• curprev 06:2906:29, 28 March 2022 MalnadachBot talk contribs m 32,255 bytes +7 Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) undo Tag: AWB

10 March 2022

• curprev 21:2121:21, 10 March 2022 MalnadachBot talk contribs m 32,248 bytes +4 Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) undo Tag: AWB

19 September 2017

• curprev 23:3923:39, 19 September 2017 Zxcvbnm talk contribs 32,244 bytes +32,089 Never mind, revert accidental edits undo
• curprev 23:3723:37, 19 September 2017 Zxcvbnm talk contribs m 155 bytes −41 No edit summary undo
• curprev 23:3623:36, 19 September 2017 Zxcvbnm talk contribs m 196 bytes 0 ←Redirected page to Talk:Mecha anime and manga undo
• curprev 23:3623:36, 19 September 2017 Zxcvbnm talk contribs 196 bytes +156 Add back in boilerplate undo
• curprev 23:3523:35, 19 September 2017 Zxcvbnm talk contribs 40 bytes −32,284 Blank and redirect to talk page undo

21 May 2016

• curprev 22:0722:07, 21 May 2016 67.14.236.50 talk 32,324 bytes +558 →Neutrality?: Replying to a two-year-old message which replied to a two-year-older message undo

2 May 2016

• curprev 17:0817:08, 2 May 2016 Jenks24 talk contribs m 31,766 bytes 0 Jenks24 moved page Talk:Real Robot to Talk:Real robot: per requested move discussion; see talk undo
• curprev 17:0717:07, 2 May 2016 Jenks24 talk contribs 31,766 bytes +1,329 →Requested move 9 April 2016: closing discussion, result was moved undo

28 April 2016

• curprev 16:3616:36, 28 April 2016 ErikHaugen talk contribs 30,437 bytes +770 →Requested move 9 April 2016: sources don't, so we shouldn't either undo

24 April 2016

• curprev 18:2918:29, 24 April 2016 Renamed user mou89p43twvqcvm8ut9w3 talk contribs 29,667 bytes +705 →Requested move 9 April 2016: support undo

21 April 2016

• curprev 05:4505:45, 21 April 2016 67.14.236.50 talk 28,962 bytes +657 →Requested move 9 April 2016: Strength of arguments undo

13 April 2016

• curprev 23:0823:08, 13 April 2016 67.14.236.50 talk 28,305 bytes +37 →Requested move 9 April 2016: add link undo
• curprev 23:0523:05, 13 April 2016 67.14.236.50 talk 28,268 bytes +573 →Requested move 9 April 2016: Next steps? undo

10 April 2016

• curprev 16:4116:41, 10 April 2016 67.14.236.50 talk 27,695 bytes +210 →Requested move 9 April 2016: In case it’s relevant undo
• curprev 06:2206:22, 10 April 2016 67.14.236.50 talk 27,485 bytes +46 →Requested move 9 April 2016 undo
• curprev 06:2006:20, 10 April 2016 67.14.236.50 talk 27,439 bytes +60 →Requested move 9 April 2016: add to OP undo
• curprev 06:1506:15, 10 April 2016 67.14.236.50 talk 27,379 bytes +245 →Requested move 9 April 2016: Maybe we do need to disambiguate, but what about the capitalization? undo
• curprev 04:1804:18, 10 April 2016 70.51.45.100 talk 27,134 bytes +200 →Requested move 9 April 2016 undo
• curprev 04:1504:15, 10 April 2016 70.51.45.100 talk 26,934 bytes +257 →Requested move 9 April 2016 undo

9 April 2016

• curprev 23:1223:12, 9 April 2016 67.14.236.50 talk 26,677 bytes +45 →Requested move 9 April 2016: add undo
• curprev 23:0723:07, 9 April 2016 67.14.236.50 talk 26,632 bytes +535 →Requested move 9 April 2016: Un-misrepresenting my argument undo
• curprev 21:0221:02, 9 April 2016 64.134.185.83 talk 26,097 bytes +465 →Requested move 9 April 2016: oppose undo
• curprev 17:0117:01, 9 April 2016 67.14.236.50 talk 25,632 bytes +4 →Requested move 9 April 2016: fmt undo
• curprev 16:5316:53, 9 April 2016 67.14.236.50 talk 25,628 bytes +1,368 →RFC: What should this be titled?: Ending RFC and starting another RM undo

2 April 2016

• curprev 20:0920:09, 2 April 2016 Gamaliel talk contribs 24,260 bytes +204 →RFC: What should this be titled? undo

18 March 2016

• curprev 12:5312:53, 18 March 2016 MjolnirPants talk contribs 24,056 bytes +665 →RFC: What should this be titled? undo

17 March 2016

• curprev 04:3704:37, 17 March 2016 67.14.236.50 talk 23,391 bytes +14 →RFC: What should this be titled?: add undo
• curprev 01:1701:17, 17 March 2016 67.14.236.50 talk 23,377 bytes +24 →RFC: What should this be titled?: dab undo
• curprev 01:1601:16, 17 March 2016 67.14.236.50 talk 23,353 bytes 0 →RFC: What should this be titled?: typo undo
• curprev 01:1601:16, 17 March 2016 67.14.236.50 talk 23,353 bytes +613 →RFC: What should this be titled?: Usage in some sources undo
• curprev 00:1000:10, 17 March 2016 SmokeyJoe talk contribs 22,740 bytes +154 →RFC: What should this be titled?: I think "genre" is both implied and too vague a description. undo
• curprev 00:0400:04, 17 March 2016 67.14.236.50 talk 22,586 bytes +312 →RFC: What should this be titled?: Anyone in favor of “genre”? undo

14 March 2016

• curprev 07:1307:13, 14 March 2016 67.14.236.50 talk 22,274 bytes +555 →RFC: What should this be titled?: Explanations undo
• curprev 07:0107:01, 14 March 2016 SmokeyJoe talk contribs 21,719 bytes +519 →RFC: What should this be titled?: ::::::: No, no, no, I am asking the questions, and you know what you are talking about. You are beginning to make a clearer case. Based upon your explanation, I would suggest '''real robot animation'''. It nee undo
• curprev 06:5706:57, 14 March 2016 67.14.236.50 talk 21,200 bytes +174 →RFC: What should this be titled?: add sources using lowercase undo
• curprev 06:4206:42, 14 March 2016 67.14.236.50 talk 21,026 bytes +14 →RFC: What should this be titled?: clarify undo
• curprev 06:4106:41, 14 March 2016 67.14.236.50 talk 21,012 bytes +94 →RFC: What should this be titled?: add undo
• curprev 06:2406:24, 14 March 2016 67.14.236.50 talk 20,918 bytes +842 →RFC: What should this be titled?: Any sources say it’s not a descriptive name? Or any other genres with their own proper names? undo
• curprev 06:1106:11, 14 March 2016 SmokeyJoe talk contribs 20,076 bytes +408 →RFC: What should this be titled?: You are correct in that I have a personal opinion here. It is the same as I had at Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_comment/Archive_12#Too_many_RfCs._Require_a_seconder_for_every_RfC. In short, there are so many Rf undo
• curprev 06:0606:06, 14 March 2016 SmokeyJoe talk contribs m 19,668 bytes +2 →RFC: What should this be titled?: f undo
• curprev 06:0606:06, 14 March 2016 SmokeyJoe talk contribs 19,666 bytes +968 →RFC: What should this be titled?: ::::: Oh, no, I am all for following the rules of English and our own naming conventions (except where there is reason for exception). I think the case is not clearly made as to the problem. Is not "Real Robot" a c undo
• curprev 06:0106:01, 14 March 2016 67.14.236.50 talk 18,698 bytes +107 →RFC: What should this be titled?: WP:RFC places no such restrictions undo
• curprev 05:5605:56, 14 March 2016 67.14.236.50 talk 18,591 bytes +275 →RFC: What should this be titled?: I thought that was the point of having NC pages undo
• curprev 05:3805:38, 14 March 2016 SmokeyJoe talk contribs 18,316 bytes +300 →RFC: What should this be titled?: Quite the opposite. There is a lack of rationale to need to do anything. The case for moving from the status quo in the above RM was not strong. RfCs are best reserved for important contentious matters. undo
• curprev 04:5204:52, 14 March 2016 67.14.236.50 talk 18,016 bytes +29 →RFC: What should this be titled?: add undo
• curprev 04:5004:50, 14 March 2016 67.14.236.50 talk 17,987 bytes +468 →RFC: What should this be titled?: All the options undo
• curprev 04:3604:36, 14 March 2016 SmokeyJoe talk contribs 17,519 bytes +244 →RFC: What should this be titled?: This is an example of an unjustified RfC. I think an RfC should not be able to be initiated without at least two editors agreeing to put the question. undo
• curprev 01:0501:05, 14 March 2016 Opencooper talk contribs 17,275 bytes +380 →RFC: What should this be titled?: comment undo