The Crow (2024 film): Revision history

Filter revisionsshowhide

To date:

Tag filter:

Invert selection

External tools:

For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

curprev 22:3922:39, 9 August 2024‎ IAmNMFlores talk contribs‎ 44,782 bytes −431‎ Nothing said about it being co-produced with UK or France. Filmnation was only the seller too, not an actual distributor undo
curprev 21:2121:21, 9 August 2024‎ 70.50.74.138 talk‎ 45,213 bytes +23‎ →‎External links undo
curprev 07:3807:38, 9 August 2024‎ WikiCleanerBot talk contribs‎ m 45,190 bytes 0‎ v2.05b - Bot T20 CW#61 - Fix errors for CW project (Reference before punctuation) undo Tag: WPCleaner

curprev 22:2822:28, 7 August 2024‎ Luke86 talk contribs‎ 45,011 bytes +29‎ No edit summary undo
curprev 10:1210:12, 7 August 2024‎ MikeAllen talk contribs‎ m 44,982 bytes +13‎ Rollback edit(s) by RolandRd (talk): non-constructive (RW 16.1) undo Tags: RW Rollback
curprev 06:1306:13, 7 August 2024‎ RolandRd talk contribs‎ 44,969 bytes −13‎ 1) as a mod you should be able to check my IP to see if this is a sock puppet account. It is not. 2) I disagreed with the term remake and proposed the term reimagining, which no one had done before. 3) This came up on IMdB forums. The verdict was that this serves as a reimagining. I'd take the verdict of a company that specializes in the film industry over any personal, anonymous opinions on Wikipedia. This is a middle ground for all parties involved. Let it rest. undo Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit

curprev 21:2321:23, 6 August 2024‎ MikeAllen talk contribs‎ m 44,982 bytes +8‎ Rollback edit(s) by RolandRd (talk): Why do you keep making different accounts for the same edits. WP:NOTHERE (RW 16.1) undo Tags: RW Rollback
curprev 19:3519:35, 6 August 2024‎ RolandRd talk contribs‎ 44,974 bytes +1‎ Since there has already been the 1994 film that presented the source material, in a sense this new movie is a remake of it, as it builds upon the exact same source - I mean this is indeed wikipedia's own definition of a remake. We cannot ignore what the cast themselves state, in multiple interviews they claim that this is a brand new, modern version of the Crow, so let me propose the term "reimagining", in order to indicate the greater discrepancy between the two. I believe this middle ground... undo Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
curprev 19:2219:22, 6 August 2024‎ RolandRd talk contribs‎ 44,973 bytes −9‎ This is a perplexing case. On the one hand almost every single media outlet describes this as a remake, yet the production team brands it as another depiction of the source material (the comic itself). Since there has already been the 1994 film that presented said source material, in a sense this new movie is a remake of it, as it builds upon the exact same source - I mean this is indeed wikipedia's own definition of a remake. Now, we cannot ignore what the cast themselves state, in multiple... undo Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit

curprev 08:4908:49, 4 August 2024‎ Metal Asylum 94 talk contribs‎ 44,316 bytes +1‎ Missing comma. undo Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
curprev 08:4808:48, 4 August 2024‎ Metal Asylum 94 talk contribs‎ 44,315 bytes −315‎ The marketing team, or even the actors themselves, can state anything they want, in order to generate more buzz for the film's release after the fair share of backlash it has received so far. For now, it would be best to list it as both a remake of the first film (as is clearly the case) and a reboot of the series. Besides, one does not negate the other. When the film actually comes out, if the plot is vastly different than the original's, we can discuss this anew. undo Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit