Jump to content

User talk:Amideg: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
AFD: r
Revert: new section
Line 47: Line 47:


[[User:ScienceApologist|ScienceApologist]] ([[User talk:ScienceApologist|talk]]) 13:04, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
[[User:ScienceApologist|ScienceApologist]] ([[User talk:ScienceApologist|talk]]) 13:04, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

== Revert ==

You'll see I have reverted the changes you made. This is because I'm not sure of the quality of the sourcing. And in the case of the family, I don't think it's relevant - the article is not about Sebastian de Grazia or the other people mentioned. Could we discuss the points one by one on the talk page please. I am also making a post at the [[WP:COIN|conflict of interest noticeboard]] and you might like to contribute to the discussion there too. [[User:Itsmejudith|Itsmejudith]] ([[User talk:Itsmejudith|talk]]) 17:26, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:26, 1 December 2009

Welcome!


Hello, Amideg, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck or looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Help Desk, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, or ask the people around you for help -- good Wikipedians don't bite the newcomers. Keep an open mind and listen for advice, but don't hesitate to be bold when editing!

If you'd like to respond to this message, or ask any questions, feel free to leave a message at my talk page!

Once you've become a more experienced Wikipedian, you may wish to take a moment to visit these pages:

Best of luck to you, and happy editing!

Luna Santin 09:05, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AFD

An editor has nominated the article Alfred de Grazia for deletion, under the Articles for deletion process. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the nomination (also see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Your opinions on why the topic of the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome: participate in the discussion by editing Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alfred de Grazia. Add four tildes like this ˜˜˜˜ to sign your comments. You can also edit the article Alfred de Grazia during the discussion, but do not remove the "Articles for Deletion" template (the box at the top of the article), this will not end the deletion debate. Cheers, Yomanganitalk 23:27, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Alfred de Grazia

We appreciate your help with this article. What we need are reliable, third party sources that establish the biographical facts about Alfred. Also, in order to source his opinions more easily, we need third party sources that note his opinion in a way so we can be sure of its prominence. I do not agree with the removal of the PhD and teaching information, but unfortunately, there were no independent sources for this information, and Wikipedia can be strict on its sourcing standards.

You may find it useful to read WP:V, WP:NPOV, WP:RS, and WP:FRINGE (the last one for the section on quantavolution and perhaps kalos if not the mainstream political science work).

I'm sorry if we got off on the wrong foot.

Please help us!

ScienceApologist (talk) 13:04, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Revert

You'll see I have reverted the changes you made. This is because I'm not sure of the quality of the sourcing. And in the case of the family, I don't think it's relevant - the article is not about Sebastian de Grazia or the other people mentioned. Could we discuss the points one by one on the talk page please. I am also making a post at the conflict of interest noticeboard and you might like to contribute to the discussion there too. Itsmejudith (talk) 17:26, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]