Jump to content

User talk:The Four Deuces: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
MiszaBot III (talk | contribs)
m Archiving 4 thread(s) (older than 30d) to [[User talk:The Four Deuces/Archives/2009/November}}]].
Black Falcon (talk | contribs)
tweak to avoid bot error - see http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AThe_Four_Deuces&action=historysubmit&diff=330687918&oldid=330245180
Line 4: Line 4:
|counter = 26
|counter = 26
|algo = old(30d)
|algo = old(30d)
|archive = User talk:The Four Deuces/Archives/%(year)d/%(monthname)s}}
|archive = User talk:The Four Deuces/Archives/%(year)d/%(monthname)s
}}
{{Archivebox}}
{{Archivebox}}



Revision as of 23:59, 9 December 2009

Thank you

I appreciate that.radek (talk) 06:59, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just want you know

Hi! It seems an attack on you has been prepared [1]. I have announced this discovery here: [2]. I also suspect Amauter Editor to be a sockpuppet of Digwuren.--Dojarca (talk) 22:25, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just want you to know I have removed the G10 tag as it is not appropriate. While it would be better to prepare his case against you off line, this is not an attack page and would only turn up in whatever proceedings you two are headed for anyway. May I suggest that you work constructively to resolve your differences/ Perhaps cool off and stay away form this other person? Dlohcierekim 22:42, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AmateurEditor

I am now pretty sure that AmateurEditor is in fact Ultramarine, a user who edited Wikipedia since early 2005 and abandoned Wikipedia just 4 days before AmateurEditor appeared first. Ultramarine was also havily involved in The Black Book of Communism disputes and related topics.--Dojarca (talk) 02:38, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is this comedy hour? Ultramarine quit the project in 2008, i.e. 1 year and 4 days, not 4 days before AmateurEditor joined. lol --Martin (talk) 03:06, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello?

Sorry, I don't know anything about that cat, do I ? Off2riorob (talk) 22:42, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't wrong about anything I nominated it for deletion as is my right and the template was removed and the cat was populated, so actually I was not wrong as you put it in your edit summary, you shouldn't do that with the name of another editor in the edit summary. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Off2riorob (talkcontribs) 22:48, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps I was mistaken to tag it with the reason I gave, I am quite new to the correct reason to tag things, I am more in learning mode with that..but please don't do that with my name in your edit summary. Off2riorob (talk) 23:37, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jewish Bolshevism

You just attempted to delete the Russia section. I notify you that the discussion is in progress in the article talk page, and the consensus has not been achieved yet about the relevance of this section. Deletion of the content without a consensus is a violation of WP policy.--Paul Siebert (talk) 18:17, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, The Four Deuces. You have new messages at Paul Siebert's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Left-wing nationalism

On what page of The Decolonization of Quebec do the Milners claim to have actually coined the expression? -- Mathieugp (talk) 14:21, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]